Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Outlook (2022-2029)

[206 Pages Report] Rising at a CAGR of 5.6% from 2022 to 2029, arthropod-borne viral infections testing demand is estimated to attain a valuation of US$ 1.3 Bn by end of the forecast period. The global Arthropod-Borne Viral Infections Testing Market is worth US$ 1.9 Bn in 2022.

Attribute Details
Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Size (2022) US$ 1.3 Bn
Predicted Net Worth (2029) US$ 1.9 Bn
Global Market Growth Metrics (2022-2029) 5.6% CAGR
Market Share of ELISA-based Tests 52%

Arboviral diseases are infections caused by virus spread among humans through the bites of arthropods. Common arthropods through which diseases are spread are mosquitoes and ticks. Arthropod-borne viral infections testing accounts for 4.4% of the global infectious disease diagnostics market, which stood at US$ 28 Bn in 2021.

Don't pay for what you don't need

Customize your report by selecting specific countries or regions and save 30%!

How The Market Progressed Till June 2022?

Particulars Details
H1, 2021 5.64%
H1, 2022 Projected 5.63%
H1, 2022 Outlook 3.83%
BPS Change - H1, 2022 (O) – H1, 2022 (P) (-) 180 ↓
BPS Change – H1, 2022 (O) – H1, 2021 (-) 181 ↓

The variation between the BPS values observed within the arthropod-borne viral infections testing market in H1, 2022 - outlook over H1, 2022 projected reflects a decline by 180 BPS units. Additionally, a value BPS decline in H1-2022 over H1-2021 by 181 Basis Point Share (BPS) is demonstrated by the market.

The market observes a decline in the BPS values owed to the poor accessibility of detection methods in low-income economies with a large disease burden. As a result, high costs of healthcare facilities along with a lack of awareness about infectious diseases are expected to restrain the market's growth.

The market is subjected to several macro economical and industry variables, which include disease epidemiology, biologics licensing, product patenting and distribution licensing. Factors such as climate change, urbanization, and global trade can expand the geographic distribution of vectors and associated arboviruses, thus increasing the potential disease burden in susceptible hosts. This factor can present an opportunity for a positive growth outlook for the market

Demand Analysis of Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing (2014 to 2021) Vs Market Metrics (2022 to 2029)

Healthcare has become an area of prime concern across the world and this is due to the rising diseases and infections across the world. There has been a substantial rise in arboviral diseases over the past few years and this has influenced demand for arthropod-borne viral infections testing.

Arthropod-borne viral infections testing demand rose at a CAGR of 4.9% from 2014 to 2021 and ended up with a market worth of US$ 1.2 Bn in 2021.

Most common arthropod-borne viral infection in the world according to WHO (World Health Organization) is dengue, with the potential risk to infect more than 30% of the world’s population.

Rising focus on public healthcare, increasing travel and trade activities on a global scale, changing lifestyle trends, environmental and climatic changes, rapid urbanization across the world, etc. are some major factors that influence arthropod-borne viral infections testing market potential on a global scale.

Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market

The market for arthropod-borne viral infections testing is anticipated to rise at a CAGR of 5.6% over the forecast period of 2022 to 2029.

Which Factors Favor Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Potential?

“Re-emergence of Arthropod-borne Viral Infections to Drive Demand”

Arthropod-borne infections have proven to be responsible for widespread epidemics across the world. Some of the notable arboviral epidemics are of dengue and Zika virus which led to further complications in the population infected.

These epidemics have been dealt with to a certain extent but have proven their re-emergence in recent times which is a major factor that drives demand for arthropod-borne viral infections testing on a global level. The unpredictable nature of these infections promotes arthropod-borne viral infections testing providers to develop better diagnostic solutions to detect and avoid a community spread of these infections.

“Increasing Government Initiatives to Limit Risk of Arboviral Infections”

Governments across the world are working in sync with health organizations to mitigate the risk of arthropod-borne viral infections. As a matter of public safety, the focus on these diseases is increasing in the past few years with severe outbreaks being recorded across the world. The emergence of coronavirus in 2020 has further bolstered the importance of government inclusion in matters of public health.

  • For instance, a pilot program funded by Global Emerging Infectious Surveillance (GEIS) a division of Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch of the U.S. is set to launch in spring of 2022 to identify emerging infectious diseases and mitigate risk. This is expected to be attained by a global laboratory network that is designed to enhance global health security.

Which Regions Should Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Providers Focus On?

“MEA and Latin America to Provide Major Opportunities for Market Players”

This FMI industry analysis provides metrics for the arthropod-borne viral infections testing market across regions such as North America, Latin America, Europe, East Asia, South Asia & Pacific, and the Middle East & Africa (MEA).

The market for arthropod-borne viral infections testing in Latin America is anticipated to see high demand over the forecast period as it accounts for a notable number of infections across the world.

Developing healthcare infrastructure and rising awareness about arthropod-borne infections is anticipated to influence arthropod-borne viral infections testing demand in this region.

Demand for arthropod-borne viral infections testing in North America is expected to be low as the incidence of arboviral infections and diseases in this region is low. Advanced healthcare infrastructure and proper preventive care reduce the chances of infection in this region.

East Asia and South Asia are expected to see high demand for arthropod-borne viral infections testing over the forecast period. Implementation of stringent regulations to curb the spread of infectious diseases in this region is anticipated to drive market potential in these regions.

Densely populated countries like India and China are expected to emerge as highly lucrative markets for arthropod-borne viral infections testing vendors.

Rising instances of arboviral infections and epidemics in the MEA region are expected to majorly drive demand for arthropod-borne viral infections testing in this region. This region is expected to be one of the most important markets on a global level owing to the re-emergence of multiple infections like Zika virus and others.

Underdeveloped healthcare infrastructure is a major restraining factor for arthropod-borne viral infections testing market in the MEA region.

Sabyasachi Ghosh
Sabyasachi Ghosh

Principal Consultant

Talk to Analyst

Find your sweet spots for generating winning opportunities in this market.

Country-wise Analysis

Why is the U.K. a Lucrative Market for Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Providers?

“Increasing Threat of Arboviral Infections Augmenting Market Expansion”

Instances of arthropod-borne viral infections have been increasing in the U.K. in recent times and this is anticipated to drive arthropod-borne viral infections testing demand in the nation. Lyme disease has become a prominent issue in the U.K. over recent years and other arthropod-borne diseases have also seen an increase in incidence.

Increasing global travel and trade are expected to fuel the adoption of arthropod-borne viral infections testing in the U.K.

What is the Outlook for Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing in Brazil?

“Developing Healthcare Infrastructure to Provide Lucrative Market Opportunities”

Brazil is anticipated to be a highly rewarding market for arthropod-borne viral infections testing vendors due to high incidence of multiple arthropod-borne viral infections like Zika virus and dengue. Brazil is a developing economy and has an emerging healthcare infrastructure that has a lot of untapped potential that arthropod-borne viral infections testing providers can unlock if they enter this market.

Category-wise Analysis

Which Test Type is Expected to Perform the Best?

“High Preference for ELISA-based Test Kits to Drive Sales through 2029”

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based tests have been immensely popular in the arthropod-borne viral infections testing marketplace over the past few years and currently account for a dominant market share of 52% in the global landscape.

Increasing preference for use of ELISA-based test kits by patients, healthcare professionals, researchers, etc. is expected to propel its popularity further.

In 2022, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) kits hold a market share of 33.5% in the global arthropod-borne viral infections testing industry. The COVID-19 pandemic boosted demand for RT-PCR test kits and this trend is expected to be prevalent over the forecast period as well.

Get the data you need at a Fraction of the cost

Personalize your report by choosing insights you need
and save 40%!

COVID-19 Crisis Survey

The COVID-19 pandemic invigorated demand for arthropod-borne viral infections testing and revolutionized our view on infectious diseases and infections. Increasing uncertainties in these diseases and their re-emergence are anticipated to play a major role in the coming years.

Sales of arthropod-borne viral infections testing kits dropped in 2020 as lockdown mandates were put in place and supply and logistic chains were disrupted. The market is expected to make a steady recovery in the post-pandemic era as restrictions are lifted across the world.

Competitive Landscape

Arthropod-borne viral infections testing providers are investing in the research and development of rapid test kits that are effective in diagnosing infections in a short period of time with minimal error.

  • In November 2021, Achico, a healthcare technology firm headquartered in Switzerland, announced the development of dengue fever diagnostic kits. This new testing kit would be based on the company’s DNA aptamer technology platform that has proven its efficiency in COVID-19 diagnosis.

Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Industry Report Scope

Attribute Details
Forecast Period 2022-2029
Historical Data Available for 2014-2021
Market Analysis US$ Mn for Value
Key Regions Covered
  • North America
  • Latin America
  • Europe
  • East Asia
  • South Asia & Pacific
  • Middle East & Africa (MEA)
Key Countries Covered
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Brazil
  • Mexico
  • Germany
  • U.K.
  • France
  • Spain
  • Italy
  • China
  • Japan
  • South Korea
  • India
  • Indonesia
  • Malaysia
  • Singapore
  • Australia
  • New Zealand
  • Turkey
  • South Africa
  • and GCC Countries
Key Market Segments Covered
  • Test Type
  • End User
  • Region
Key Companies Profiled
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
  • Roche Molecular Systems Inc.
  • bioMérieux SA
  • InBios International Inc.
  • NovaTec Immundiagnostica GmbH
  • Euroimmun AG (Sub. PerkinElmer)
  • Quest Diagnostics
  • Certest Biotec S.L.
  • Response Biomedical Corp.
  • Chembio Diagnostic Systems Inc.
  • Abbott Laboratories
Pricing Available upon Request

Key Segments of Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Industry Survey

Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market by Test Type:

  • ELISA-based Tests for Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing
  • RT-PCR-based Tests for Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing
  • Immunochromatography Rapid Diagnosis for Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing

Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market by End User:

  • Arthropod-borne Viral Infections in Testing Hospitals
  • Arthropod-borne Viral Infections in Public Health Laboratories
  • Arthropod-borne Viral Infections in Diagnostic Centres
  • Others

Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market by Region:

  • North America Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market
  • Latin America Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market
  • Europe Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market
  • East Asia Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market
  • South Asia & Pacific Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market
  • Middle East & Africa (MEA) Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the arthropod-borne viral infections testing market worth?

The global arthropod-borne viral infections testing market holds a valuation of US$ 1.3 Bn in 2022.

What market share is held by ELISA-based tests in 2022?

ELISA-based tests account for 52% of the global arthropod-borne viral infections testing market share.

At what CAGR is the arthropod-borne viral infections testing industry anticipated to progress going forward?

Demand for arthropod-borne viral infections testing is predicted to evolve at a CAGR of 5.6% from 2022 to 2029.

What market statistics are forecasted for 2029?

Sales of arthropod-borne viral infections testing kits are projected to reach US$ 1.9 Bn by 2029.

Which key players are profiled in this arthropod-borne viral infections testing industry survey?

Leading arthropod-borne viral infections testing companies are Roche Molecular Systems Inc., bioMérieux SA, InBios International Inc., NovaTec Immundiagnostica GmbH, Euroimmun AG (Sub. PerkinElmer), Quest Diagnostics, Certest Biotec S.L., Response Biomedical Corp., Chembio Diagnostic Systems Inc., and Abbott Laboratories.

Table of Content
1. Executive Summary
     1.1. Global Market Outlook
     1.2. Demand Side Trends
     1.3. Supply Side Trends
     1.4. Technology Roadmap
     1.5. Analysis and Recommendations
2. Market Overview
     2.1. Market Coverage / Taxonomy
     2.2. Market Definition / Scope / Limitations
3. Key Market Trends
     3.1. Key Trends Impacting the Market
     3.2. Product Innovation / Development Trends
     3.3. Macro-Economic Factors
4. Key Success Factors
     4.1. Product Adoption / Usage Analysis
     4.2. Disease Epidemiology, By Key countries
     4.3. Strategic Promotional Strategies
     4.4. Regulatory Scenario
     4.5. Opportunity Analysis
5. Global Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Demand Analysis 2014-2021 and Forecast, 2022-2029
     5.1. Historical Market Volume (Mn Units) Analysis, 2014-2021
     5.2. Current and Future Market Volume (Mn Units) Projections, 2022-2029
     5.3. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis
6. Global Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market - Pricing Analysis
     6.1. Regional Pricing Analysis By Test Type
     6.2. Pricing Break-up
          6.2.1. Manufacturer Level Pricing
          6.2.2. Distributor Level Pricing
     6.3. Global Average Pricing Analysis Benchmark
7. Global Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Demand (in Value or Size in US$ Mn) Analysis 2014-2021 and Forecast, 2022-2029
     7.1. Historical Market Value (US$ Mn) Analysis, 2014-2021
     7.2. Current and Future Market Value (US$ Mn) Projections, 2022-2029
          7.2.1. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis
          7.2.2. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis
8. Market Background
     8.1. Macro-Economic Factors
          8.1.1. Global GDP Growth Outlook
          8.1.2. Global Internet Penetration Outlook
          8.1.3. Global Media and Entertainment Industry Outlook
     8.2. Forecast Factors - Relevance & Impact
          8.2.1. Top Companies Historical Growth
          8.2.2. Global Healthcare Industry Outlook
          8.2.3. Global GDP Growth Outlook
          8.2.4. Research and Developmental Activities
          8.2.5. Global Diagnostic Industry Outlook
     8.3. Value Chain
     8.4. Market Dynamics
          8.4.1. Drivers
          8.4.2. Restraints
          8.4.3. Opportunity Analysis
9. Global Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis 2014-2021 and Forecast 2022-2029, by Test Type
     9.1. Introduction / Key Findings
     9.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Analysis By Test Type, 2014-2021
     9.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By Test Type, 2021 - 2021
          9.3.1. ELISA-based Tests
          9.3.2. RT-PCR based Tests
          9.3.3. Immunochromatography Rapid Diagnosis
     9.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Test Type
10.Global Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis 2014-2021 and Forecast 2022-2029, by End User
     10.1. Introduction / Key Findings
     10.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Analysis By End User, 2014-2021
     10.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By End User, 2021 - 2021
          10.3.1. Hospitals
          10.3.2. Public Health Laboratory
          10.3.3. Diagnostic Centers
          10.3.4. Others
     10.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By End User
11.Global Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis 2014-2021 and Forecast 2022-2029, by Region
     11.1. Introduction
     11.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Analysis By Region, 2014-2021
     11.3. Current Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By Region, 2021 - 2021
          11.3.1. North America
          11.3.2. Latin America
          11.3.3. Europe
          11.3.4. Middle East and Africa (MEA)
          11.3.5. East Asia
          11.3.6. South Asia
          11.3.7. Oceania
     11.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Region
12. North America Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis 2014-2021 and Forecast 2022-2029
     12.1. Introduction
     12.2. Pricing Analysis
     12.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2014-2021
     12.4. Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022-2029
          12.4.1.By Country
               12.4.1.1. U.S.
               12.4.1.2. Canada
          12.4.2. By Test Type
          12.4.3. By End User
     12.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
          12.5.1. By Country
          12.5.2. By Test Type
          12.5.3. By End User
     12.6. Market Trends
     12.7. Key Market Participants - Intensity Mapping
     12.8. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis
13. Latin America Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis 2014-2021 and Forecast 2022-2029
     13.1. Introduction
     13.2. Pricing Analysis
     13.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2014-2021
     13.4. Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022-2029
          13.4.1.By Country
               13.4.1.1. Brazil
               13.4.1.2. Mexico
               13.4.1.3. Rest of Latin America
          13.4.2. By Test Type
          13.4.3. By End User
     13.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
          13.5.1. By Country
          13.5.2. By Test Type
          13.5.3. By End User
     13.6. Market Trends
     13.7. Key Market Participants - Intensity Mapping
     13.8. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis
14.Europe Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis 2014-2021 and Forecast 2022-2029
     14.1. Introduction
     14.2. Pricing Analysis
     14.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2014-2021
     14.4. Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022-2029
          14.4.1.By Country
               14.4.1.1. Germany
               14.4.1.2. Italy
               14.4.1.3. France
               14.4.1.4. U.K.
               14.4.1.5. Spain
               14.4.1.6. BENELUX
               14.4.1.7. Russia
               14.4.1.8. Rest of Europe
          14.4.2. By Test Type
          14.4.3. By End User
     14.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
          14.5.1. By Country
          14.5.2. By Test Type
          14.5.3. By End User
     14.6. Market Trends
     14.7. Key Market Participants - Intensity Mapping
     14.8. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis
15.South Asia Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis 2014-2021 and Forecast 2022-2029
     15.1. Introduction
     15.2. Pricing Analysis
     15.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2014-2021
     15.4. Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022-2029
          15.4.1.By Country
               15.4.1.1. India
               15.4.1.2. Thailand
               15.4.1.3. Indonesia
               15.4.1.4. Malaysia
               15.4.1.5. Rest of South Asia
          15.4.2. By Test Type
          15.4.3. By End User
     15.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
          15.5.1. By Country
          15.5.2. By Test Type
          15.5.3. By End User
     15.6. Market Trends
     15.7. Key Market Participants - Intensity Mapping
     15.8. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis
16.East Asia Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis 2014-2021 and Forecast 2022-2029
     16.1. Introduction
     16.2. Pricing Analysis
     16.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2014-2021
     16.4. Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022-2029
          16.4.1.By Country
               16.4.1.1. China
               16.4.1.2. Japan
               16.4.1.3. South Korea
          16.4.2. By Test Type
          16.4.3. By End User
     16.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
          16.5.1. By Country
          16.5.2. By Test Type
          16.5.3. By End User
     16.6. Market Trends
     16.7. Key Market Participants - Intensity Mapping
     16.8. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis
17.Oceania Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis 2014-2021 and Forecast 2022-2029
     17.1. Introduction
     17.2. Pricing Analysis
     17.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2014-2021
     17.4. Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022-2029
          17.4.1.By Country
               17.4.1.1. Australia
               17.4.1.2. New Zealand
          17.4.2. By Test Type
          17.4.3. By End User
     17.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
          17.5.1. By Country
          17.5.2. By Test Type
          17.5.3. By End User
     17.6. Market Trends
     17.7. Key Market Participants - Intensity Mapping
     17.8. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis
18.Middle East and Africa Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis 2014-2021 and Forecast 2022-2029
     18.1. Introduction
     18.2. Pricing Analysis
     18.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2014-2021
     18.4. Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022-2029
          18.4.1. By Country
               18.4.1.1. GCC Countries
               18.4.1.2. Turkey
               18.4.1.3. Northern Africa
               18.4.1.4. South Africa
               18.4.1.5. Rest of Middle East and Africa
          18.4.2. By Test Type
          18.4.3. By End User
     18.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
          18.5.1. By Country
          18.5.2. By Test Type
          18.5.3. By End User
     18.6. Market Trends
     18.7. Key Market Participants - Intensity Mapping
     18.8. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis
19. Key and Emerging Countries Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis 2014-2021 and Forecast 2022-2029
     19.1. Introduction
          19.1.1. Market Value Proportion Analysis, By Key Countries
          19.1.2. Global Vs. Country Growth Comparison
     19.2. U.S. Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis
          19.2.1. By Test Type
          19.2.2. By End User
     19.3. Canada Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis
          19.3.1. By Test Type
          19.3.2. By End User
     19.4. Mexico Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis
          19.4.1. By Test Type
          19.4.2. By End User
     19.5. Brazil Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis
          19.5.1. By Test Type
          19.5.2. By End User
     19.6. U.K. Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis
          19.6.1. By Test Type
          19.6.2. By End User
     19.7. Germany Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis
          19.7.1. By Test Type
          19.7.2. By End User
     19.8. France Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis
          19.8.1. By Test Type
          19.8.2. By End User
     19.9. Italy Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis
          19.9.1. By Test Type
          19.9.2. By End User
     19.10. Spain Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis
          19.10.1. By Test Type
          19.10.2. By End User
     19.11. BENELUX Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis
          19.11.1. By Test Type
          19.11.2. By End User
     19.12. Russia Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis
          19.12.1. By Test Type
          19.12.2. By End User
     19.13. China Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis
          19.13.1. By Test Type
          19.13.2. By End User
     19.14. Japan Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis
          19.14.1. By Test Type
          19.14.2. By End User
     19.15. South Korea Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis
          19.15.1. By Test Type
          19.15.2. By End User
     19.16. India Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis
          19.16.1. By Test Type
          19.16.2. By End User
     19.17. ASEAN Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis
          19.17.1. By Test Type
          19.17.2. By End User
     19.18. Australia Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis
          19.18.1. By Test Type
          19.18.2. By End User
     19.19. New Zealand Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis
          19.19.1. By Test Type
          19.19.2. By End User
     19.20. GCC Countries Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis
          19.20.1. By Test Type
          19.20.2. By End User
     19.21. Turkey Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis
          19.21.1. By Test Type
          19.21.2. By End User
     19.22. South Africa Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market Analysis
          19.22.1. By Test Type
          19.22.2. By End User
20.Market Structure Analysis
     20.1. Market Analysis by Tier of Companies (Arbovirus Testing)
     20.2. Market Concentration
     20.3. Market Share Analysis of Top Players
     20.4. Market Presence Analysis
          20.4.1. By Regional footprint of Players
          20.4.2. Product foot print by Players
          20.4.3. Channel Foot Print by Players
21.Competition Analysis
     21.1. Competition Dashboard
     21.2. Competition Benchmarking
     21.3. Competition Deep Dive
          21.3.1. Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
               21.3.1.1. Overview
               21.3.1.2. Product Portfolio
               21.3.1.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
               21.3.1.4. Sales Footprint
               21.3.1.5. Strategy Overview
                     21.3.1.5.1. Marketing Strategy
                     21.3.1.5.2. Product Strategy
                     21.3.1.5.3. Channel Strategy
          21.3.2. Roche Molecular Systems Inc.
               21.3.2.1. Overview
               21.3.2.2. Product Portfolio
               21.3.2.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
               21.3.2.4. Sales Footprint
               21.3.2.5. Strategy Overview
                     21.3.2.5.1. Marketing Strategy
                     21.3.2.5.2. Product Strategy
                     21.3.2.5.3. Channel Strategy
          21.3.3. bioMérieux SA
               21.3.3.1. Overview
               21.3.3.2. Product Portfolio
               21.3.3.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
               21.3.3.4. Sales Footprint
               21.3.3.5. Strategy Overview
                     21.3.3.5.1. Marketing Strategy
                     21.3.3.5.2. Product Strategy
                     21.3.3.5.3. Channel Strategy
          21.3.4. Abbott Laboratories
               21.3.4.1. Overview
               21.3.4.2. Product Portfolio
               21.3.4.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
               21.3.4.4. Sales Footprint
               21.3.4.5. Strategy Overview
                     21.3.4.5.1. Marketing Strategy
                     21.3.4.5.2. Product Strategy
                     21.3.4.5.3. Channel Strategy
          21.3.5. InBios International, Inc.
               21.3.5.1. Overview
               21.3.5.2. Product Portfolio
               21.3.5.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
               21.3.5.4. Sales Footprint
               21.3.5.5. Strategy Overview
                     21.3.5.5.1. Marketing Strategy
                     21.3.5.5.2. Product Strategy
                     21.3.5.5.3. Channel Strategy
          21.3.6. NovaTec Immundiagnostica GmbH
               21.3.6.1. Overview
               21.3.6.2. Product Portfolio
               21.3.6.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
               21.3.6.4. Sales Footprint
               21.3.6.5. Strategy Overview
                     21.3.6.5.1. Marketing Strategy
                     21.3.6.5.2. Product Strategy
                     21.3.6.5.3. Channel Strategy
          21.3.7. Euroimmun AG (Sub. PerkinElmer)
               21.3.7.1. Overview
               21.3.7.2. Product Portfolio
               21.3.7.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
               21.3.7.4. Sales Footprint
               21.3.7.5. Strategy Overview
                     21.3.7.5.1. Marketing Strategy
                     21.3.7.5.2. Product Strategy
                     21.3.7.5.3. Channel Strategy
          21.3.8. Quest Diagnostics
               21.3.8.1. Overview
               21.3.8.2. Product Portfolio
               21.3.8.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
               21.3.8.4. Sales Footprint
               21.3.8.5. Strategy Overview
                     21.3.8.5.1. Marketing Strategy
                     21.3.8.5.2. Product Strategy
                     21.3.8.5.3. Channel Strategy
          21.3.9. Certest Biotec S.L.
               21.3.9.1. Overview
               21.3.9.2. Product Portfolio
               21.3.9.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
               21.3.9.4. Sales Footprint
               21.3.9.5. Strategy Overview
                     21.3.9.5.1. Marketing Strategy
                     21.3.9.5.2. Product Strategy
                     21.3.9.5.3. Channel Strategy
          21.3.10. Response Biomedical Corp.
               21.3.10.1. Overview
               21.3.10.2. Product Portfolio
               21.3.10.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
               21.3.10.4. Sales Footprint
               21.3.10.5. Strategy Overview
                     21.3.10.5.1. Marketing Strategy
                     21.3.10.5.2. Product Strategy
                     21.3.10.5.3. Channel Strategy
          21.3.11. Chembio Diagnostic Systems, Inc.
               21.3.11.1. Overview
               21.3.11.2. Product Portfolio
               21.3.11.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)
               21.3.11.4. Sales Footprint
               21.3.11.5. Strategy Overview
                     21.3.11.5.1. Marketing Strategy
                     21.3.11.5.2. Product Strategy
                     21.3.11.5.3. Channel Strategy
22.Assumptions and Acronyms Used
23. Research Methodology
Recommendations

Healthcare

Infection Prevention Market

December 2023

REP-GB-13950

333 pages

Healthcare

Swab and Viral Transport Medium Market

March 2023

REP-GB-11195

333 pages

Healthcare

Eye Infections Treatment Market

July 2022

REP-GB-1300

256 pages

Healthcare

Corneal Ulcer Treatment Market

June 2022

REP-GB-6953

244 pages

Explore Healthcare Insights

View Reports
Future Market Insights

Arthropod-borne Viral Infections Testing Market

Schedule a Call