Intelligent Pigging Services Market Size & Forecast to 2029

Intelligent Pigging Services Market - Key Research Findings

Intelligent Pigging Services Market

The global intelligent pigging services market was valued at ~US$ 537 Mn in 2018.
During the forecast period of 2019-2029, the intelligent pigging services market is projected to grow at a CAGR of ~6%.
The magnetic flux leakage technology of intelligent pigging services is expected to remain the most preferred technology, primarily for its high flexibility.
North America market is predicted to hold nearly half of the revenue shares in the intelligent pigging services market by the end of 2029.
- North America market is expected to continue to be an opportunistic market for intelligent pigging services, owing to greater adoption of magnetic flux leakage technology and increasing demand for flexible products.

Don't pay for what you don't need

Customize your report by selecting specific countries or regions and save 30%!

Important Factors Shaping the Intelligent Pigging Services Market

Robust Advancements in Inspection Technologies
Due to rising integration of automation technology, the original equipment manufacturers and vendors are constantly improving their pipeline inspections and maintenance by investing in research and developments. Advanced intelligent pigging technologies enable efficient diagnosis of flow in the pipeline.

Intelligent pigging services providers are constantly aiming to find dents and deformations that are used by pipeline operators.

High Cost of Intelligent Pigging Services as a Restraining Factor
According to the FMI’s analysis, the average pricing of intelligent pigging technologies such as UT, MFL, and EMAT technologies require substantial capital investments, which hampers its adoption especially in the developing economies such as India and ASEAN countries. Due to high cost involved in intelligent pigging services, various pipeline operators opt for cost-effective alternatives as compared to smart or intelligent pigging services. This will restraint the growth of the intelligent pigging services market.

Growing number of players in the intelligent pigging services market have also intensified the competition, which in turn, will dwindle profit margins especially in the U.S. where there are large number of original equipment manufacturers.

Inventing Small Pigs for Conventional Use
Due to rise in demand for more sophisticated and small-sized electronic systems, manufacturers are offering comparatively small intelligent pigs for conventional use. Due to the invention of smaller size intelligent pigs, inspection and maintenance of the small-diameter has become possible. The result is likely to lead to significant growth of the intelligent pigging services market.

Alike pigging, manufacturers follow same standards for small pigs i.e. API Standard (In-line inspection systems qualification standard), NACE International (Recommended practice for in-line inspection pipelines) and American Society of Non-destructive Testing (In-line inspection personnel qualification and certification).

Intensifying Pressure Due to Stringent Regulations Representing a Potential Threat

With the growing industry and government regulations, regions such as North America and Western Europe have stringent pipeline safety regulations in place to protect the environment and avoid business discontinuity. This intensifying pressure is likely to pose as a potential threat for intelligent pigging service providers. Most regulatory authorities across the world lay emphasis on regular inspection and maintenance of oil and gas pipelines as their regular supply is the key to ensure stable economic growth.

Talk to Analyst

Find your sweet spots for generating winning opportunities in this market.

Main Strategies and Areas of Focus for Prominent Market Players

The intelligent pigging services market is a moderately competitive market.
Main strategies monitored by key players in the intelligent pigging services market are the expansion of business through mergers and acquisitions, product launches, recognitions, alliances, and collaborations. Key market players focus on strategies such as innovations and product expansions through new dealership collaborations and networks.
Noteworthy investments in research and development for novel and sturdy products are anticipated to boost the growth of the intelligent pigging services market.
Leading players in the intelligent pigging services market are T.D. Williamson, Inc., LIN SCAN, GE Oil and Gas (PII Pipeline Solutions), Baker Hughes Incorporated, Enduro Pipeline Services Inc., NDT Global, OMV Group, Petrobras, Royal Dutch Shell PLC, and ConocoPhillips, among others.

Intelligent Pigging Services Market: Segmentation

Technology

Magnetic Flux Leakage
Ultrasonic Test

End Use

Region

North America
Latin America
Western Europe
Eastern Europe
APEJ
Japan
Middle East and Africa

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Growth Outlook for Intelligent Pigging Services Market?

The intelligent pigging services market is likely to secure a CAGR of 6% through 2032.

By 2032, how much can the Intelligent Pigging Services Market Grow?

The intelligent pigging services market size is estimated to cross US$ 1200.84 Mn by 2032.

What is the Current Valuation of the Intelligent Pigging Services Market?

The intelligent pigging services market is likely to record a value of US$ 670.54 Mn in 2022.

Which Region is likely to Lead the Intelligent Pigging Services Market?

North America is likely to lead the intelligent pigging services market.

Table of Content

1. Executive Summary

1.1. Global Market Outlook

1.2. Analysis and Recommendations

2. Market Overview

2.1. Market Taxonomy

2.2. Market Definition

2.3. Historical Market Value (US$ Mn) Analysis, 2014-2018

2.4. Current and Future Market Value (US$ Mn) Projections, 2019-2029

2.4.1. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis

2.4.2. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis

3. Market Background

3.1. Macro-Economic Factors

3.2. Forecast Factors - Relevance & Impact

3.3. Value Chain

3.4. Market Dynamics

3.4.1. Drivers

3.4.2. Restraints

3.4.3. Opportunity Analysis

4. Global Intelligent Pigging Services Market Analysis 2014-2018 and Forecast 2019-2029, By Technology

4.1. Introduction Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By Technology, 2014 - 2018

4.2. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) and Forecast By Technology, 2019 - 2029

4.2.1. Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL)

4.2.2. Ultrasonic Test (UT)

4.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Technology

5. Global Intelligent Pigging Services Market Analysis 2014-2018 and Forecast 2019-2029, By End Use

5.1. Introduction Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By End Use, 2014 - 2018

5.2. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) and Forecast By End Use, 2019 - 2029

5.2.1. Oil

5.2.2. Gas

5.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis By End Use

6. Global Intelligent Pigging Services Market Analysis 2014-2018 and Forecast 2019-2029, by Region

6.1. Introduction

6.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) By Region, 2014 - 2018

6.3. Current Market Size (US$ Mn) and Forecast By Region, 2019 - 2029

6.3.1. APEJ

6.3.2. Middle East and Africa

6.3.3. Latin America

6.3.4. Western Europe

6.3.5. Eastern Europe

6.3.6. North America

6.3.7. Japan

6.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Region

7. North America Intelligent Pigging Services Market Analysis 2014-2018 and Forecast 2019-2029

7.1. Introduction

7.2. Pricing Analysis

7.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2014 - 2018

7.4. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2019-2029

7.4.1. By Country

7.4.1.1. U.S.

7.4.1.2. Canada

7.4.2. By Technology

7.4.3. By Application

7.4.4. By End Use

7.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis

7.5.1. By Country

7.5.2. By Technology

7.5.3. By Application

7.5.4. By End Use

7.6. Market Trends

7.7. Key Market Participants - Intensity Mapping

7.8. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis

8. Eastern Europe Intelligent Pigging Services Market Analysis 2014-2018 and Forecast 2019-2029

8.1. Introduction

8.2. Pricing Analysis

8.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2014 - 2018

8.4. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2019-2029

8.4.1. By Country

8.4.1.1. Russia

8.4.1.2. Poland

8.4.1.3. Rest of Eastern Europe

8.4.2. By Technology

8.4.3. By End Use

8.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis

8.5.1. By Country

8.5.2. By Technology

8.5.3. By End Use

8.6. Market Trends

8.7. Key Market Participants - Intensity Mapping

8.8. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis

9. Middle East and Africa Intelligent Pigging Services Market Analysis 2014-2018 and Forecast 2019-2029

9.1. Introduction

9.2. Pricing Analysis

9.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2014 - 2018

9.4. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2019-2029

9.4.1. By Country

9.4.1.1. GCC Countries

9.4.1.2. Turkey

9.4.1.3. South Africa

9.4.1.4. Israel

9.4.1.5. Nigeria

9.4.1.6. Iran

9.4.1.7. Rest of Middle East and Africa

9.4.2. By Technology

9.4.3. By End Use

9.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis

9.5.1. By Country

9.5.2. By Technology

9.5.3. By End Use

9.6. Market Trends

9.7. Key Market Participants - Intensity Mapping

9.8. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis

10. Western Europe Intelligent Pigging Services Market Analysis 2014-2018 and Forecast 2019-2029

10.1. Introduction

10.2. Pricing Analysis

10.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2014 - 2018

10.4. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2019-2029

10.4.1. By Country

10.4.1.1. Germany

10.4.1.2. Italy

10.4.1.3. France

10.4.1.4. U.K.

10.4.1.5. Spain

10.4.1.6. Rest of Western Europe

10.4.2. By Technology

10.4.3. By End Use

10.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis

10.5.1. By Country

10.5.2. By Technology

10.5.3. By End Use

10.6. Market Trends

10.7. Key Market Participants - Intensity Mapping

10.8. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis

11. APEJ Intelligent Pigging Services Market Analysis 2014-2018 and Forecast 2019-2029

11.1. Introduction

11.2. Pricing Analysis

11.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2014 - 2018

11.4. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2019-2029

11.4.1. By Country

11.4.1.1. India

11.4.1.2. China

11.4.1.3. Oceania

11.4.1.4. ASEAN Countries

11.4.1.5. Rest of APEJ

11.4.2. By Technology

11.4.3. By End Use

11.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis

11.5.1. By Country

11.5.2. By Technology

11.5.3. By End Use

11.6. Market Trends

11.7. Key Market Participants - Intensity Mapping

11.8. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis

12. Latin America Intelligent Pigging Services Market Analysis 2014-2018 and Forecast 2019-2029

12.1. Introduction

12.2. Pricing Analysis

12.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2014 - 2018

12.4. Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2019-2029

12.4.1. By Country

12.4.1.1. Brazil

12.4.1.2. Mexico

12.4.1.3. Argentina

12.4.1.4. Rest of Latin America

12.4.2. By Technology

12.4.3. By End Use

12.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis

12.5.1. By Country

12.5.2. By Technology

12.5.3. By End Use

12.6. Market Trends

12.7. Key Market Participants - Intensity Mapping

12.8. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis

13. Japan Intelligent Pigging Services Market Analysis 2014-2018 and Forecast 2019-2029

13.1. Introduction

13.2. Pricing Analysis

13.3. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2014 - 2018

13.4. Market Size (US$ Mn)Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2019-2029

13.4.1. By Technology

13.4.2. By End Use

13.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis

13.5.1. By Technology

13.5.2. By End Use

13.6. Market Trends

13.7. Key Market Participants - Intensity Mapping

13.8. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis

14. Market Structure Analysis

14.1. Market Analysis by Tier of Companies

14.2. Market Concentration

14.3. Market Share Analysis of Top Players

14.4. Market Presence Analysis

14.4.1. By Regional footprint of Players

14.4.2. Product foot print by Players

14.4.3. Channel Foot Print by Players

15. Competition Analysis

15.1. Competition Dashboard

15.2. Pricing Analysis by Competition

15.3. Competition Benchmarking

15.4. Competition Deep Dive

15.4.1. LIN SCAN

15.4.1.1. Overview

15.4.1.2. Product Portfolio

15.4.1.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)

15.4.1.4. Sales Footprint

15.4.1.5. Strategy Overview

15.4.1.5.1. Marketing Strategy

15.4.1.5.2. Product Strategy

15.4.1.5.3. Channel Strategy

15.4.2. T.D. Williamson, Inc

15.4.2.1. Overview

15.4.2.2. Product Portfolio

15.4.2.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)

15.4.2.4. Sales Footprint

15.4.2.5. Strategy Overview

15.4.2.5.1. Marketing Strategy

15.4.2.5.2. Product Strategy

15.4.2.5.3. Channel Strategy

15.4.3. Baker Hughes Incorporated

15.4.3.1. Overview

15.4.3.2. Product Portfolio

15.4.3.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)

15.4.3.4. Sales Footprint

15.4.3.5. Strategy Overview

15.4.3.5.1. Marketing Strategy

15.4.3.5.2. Product Strategy

15.4.3.5.3. Channel Strategy

15.4.4. NDT Global GmbH & Co. KG

15.4.4.1. Overview

15.4.4.2. Product Portfolio

15.4.4.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)

15.4.4.4. Sales Footprint

15.4.4.5. Strategy Overview

15.4.4.5.1. Marketing Strategy

15.4.4.5.2. Product Strategy

15.4.4.5.3. Channel Strategy

15.4.5. Enduro Pipeline Services, Inc.

15.4.5.1. Overview

15.4.5.2. Product Portfolio

15.4.5.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)

15.4.5.4. Sales Footprint

15.4.5.5. Strategy Overview

15.4.5.5.1. Marketing Strategy

15.4.5.5.2. Product Strategy

15.4.5.5.3. Channel Strategy

15.4.6. Petróleo Brasileiro S.A

15.4.6.1. Overview

15.4.6.2. Product Portfolio

15.4.6.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)

15.4.6.4. Sales Footprint

15.4.6.5. Strategy Overview

15.4.6.5.1. Marketing Strategy

15.4.6.5.2. Product Strategy

15.4.6.5.3. Channel Strategy

15.4.7. OMV Groups

15.4.7.1. Overview

15.4.7.2. Product Portfolio

15.4.7.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)

15.4.7.4. Sales Footprint

15.4.7.5. Strategy Overview

15.4.7.5.1. Marketing Strategy

15.4.7.5.2. Product Strategy

15.4.7.5.3. Channel Strategy

15.4.8. ConocoPhillips

15.4.8.1. Overview

15.4.8.2. Product Portfolio

15.4.8.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)

15.4.8.4. Sales Footprint

15.4.8.5. Strategy Overview

15.4.8.5.1. Marketing Strategy

15.4.8.5.2. Product Strategy

15.4.8.5.3. Channel Strategy

15.4.9. Royal Dutch Shell PLC.

15.4.9.1. Overview

15.4.9.2. Product Portfolio

15.4.9.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Channel/Region)

15.4.9.4. Sales Footprint

15.4.9.5. Strategy Overview

15.4.9.5.1. Marketing Strategy

15.4.9.5.2. Product Strategy

15.4.9.5.3. Channel Strategy

16. Assumptions and Acronyms Used

17. Research Methodology