The global WAN-connected returnable transport asset tracking market valuation is estimated to be worth around US$ 74.36 million for the year 2023. As per the FMI analysis report, this market size is expected to grow at an annual rate of 12% between 2023 and 2033. By the end of this forecast period, the overall size of the market is projected to reach US$ 230.95 million.
These days, the digitization of the transportation and logistics sector has amplified with the adoption of advanced telecommunication channels. Owing to this advancement, several pre-existing wide area network (WAN) service providers came forward to capitalize on this opportunity.
Interestingly, the WAN connection of a huge volume and traffic of returnable transport assets turned out to be a relief for fleet owners or businesses. Gradually, WAN connection got adopted by businessmen at different ends of any supply chain dealing in returnable transport assets. However, the WAN technologies only account for a small portion of all connections deployed by the returnable transport asset tracking market players.
Third-party party WAN connectivity service providers are expected to remain the main contenders on the technology front as returnable transport asset tracking is an add-on service. Moreover, as these service providers assure proper product differentiation, therefore, are expected to gain popularity in the coming days.
The development of item-tracking management solutions for static as well as remote assets is a development influencing the market remarkably these days. On the other hand, the implementation of cloud service platforms has further strengthened WAN-connected tracking services in the last few years.
Recent advancements in radio frequency identification (RFID) technologies have enabled several end users to integrate affordable and effective asset monitoring devices. Furthermore, the growing trend of using the internet of things (IoT) has further necessitated the integration of WAN connectivity to utilize it at its full potential.
The most significant driver for the higher deployment of WAN-connected returnable transport asset tracking services, however, is a better awareness of use-case subsets. So, as per the experts at FMI, the adoption of WAN connected returnable transport asset tracking services is expected to strengthen in the next ten years.
Attributes | Details |
---|---|
WAN Connected Returnable Transport Asset Tracking Market Share (2022) | US$ 68.85 million |
WAN Connected Returnable Transport Asset Tracking Market Size Value (2023) | US$ 74.36 million |
WAN Connected Returnable Transport Asset Tracking Market Size Value (2033) | US$ 230.95 million |
WAN Connected Returnable Transport Asset Tracking Market Growth Rate (2023 to 2033) | 12% |
Global WAN Connected Returnable Transport Asset Tracking Market Historical Analysis (2018 to 2022) Vs. Forecast Outlook (2023 to 2033)
As per the previous market survey report on WAN connected returnable transport asset tracking business, it is gaining traction in recent years. In 2018, the net worth of the market was nearly US$ 50.6 million. In the following five years from 2018 to 2022, the market registered a promising CAGR and concluded at a worth of US$ 68.85 million.
WAN connected management in manufacturing facilities and office spaces by asset management and tracking solutions has played an important role in the said market. In fact, achieving operational efficiency in asset management is regarded to be a significant factor in the boost of WAN services in the transportation sector.
The overall market witnessed a slight dip during the financial years 2020-21 and 2021-2022 owing to the widespread prohibition of transportation and logistics in non-essential items. According to FMI, the WAN RTA tracking market would have over 117 connections by 2027 rendering the market at a valuation of US$ 117 million.
Don't pay for what you don't need
Customize your report by selecting specific countries or regions and save 30%!
The requirement for remote transport asset management services is projected to rise with the proliferation of e-commerce retail supply chains around the world. The online sales channels have robustly expanded the logistics sector, which is expected to progress the WAN connectivity in traffic asset tracking and management.
Automation and IoT solution providers have long targeted Returnable Transport Assets (RTAs) as a very potential segment of investment requiring higher tracking and management in a wider area. During the past decade, there have been sizable shipments of Wide-Area Network (WAN) technology into this business.
A broad ecosystem of WAN connected returnable transport asset tracking management solution providers is expected to be crucial for market growth.
What are the Driving Factors for the Global WAN Connected Returnable Transport Asset Tracking Market in the Forecast Years?
The requirement for remote transport asset management services is projected to rise with the proliferation of e-commerce retail supply chains around the world. The online sales channels have robustly expanded the logistics sector, which is expected to progress the WAN connectivity in traffic asset tracking and management.
Automation and IoT solution providers have long targeted Returnable Transport Assets (RTAs) as a very potential segment of investment requiring higher tracking and management in a wider area. During the past decade, there have been sizable shipments of Wide-Area Network (WAN) technology into this business.
A broad ecosystem of WAN connected returnable transport asset tracking management solution providers is expected to be crucial for market growth.
As the initial sector of application, the WAN connected returnable transport asset tracking services for the transportation and logistics sector is the leading segment. Moreover, with the improvement of the economy and services sector transportation and logistics sector is poised to continue as the leading segment through 2033. In recent years many industries requiring WAN connected returnable transport asset tracking services from third-party providers are focussing on developing it by themselves.
The manufacturing industries are the leading developers of domestic WAN connected RTA tracking solutions and are progressing at a higher rate than other end-use industries. Manufacturing industries are readily adopting the deployment of WAN connected returnable transport asset tracking services for assisting businesses in achieving inventory liabilities.
As the WAN connectivity for RTA tracking services is at an initial stage of development so on-premise services currently hold the larger market share. Many end-use industries those adopted WAN connected returnable transport asset tracking services in the last decade mostly preferred on-premise solutions.
The advancement of cloud-based technologies has been remarkable in the last few years and is anticipated to strengthen the on-cloud segment through 2033. Though its installation cost is higher, the overall cost comes down significantly for the whole operation giving it an edge over the earlier segment.
WAN Connected Returnable Transport Asset Tracking Market:
Attributes | WAN Connected Returnable Transport Asset Tracking Market |
---|---|
CAGR (2023 to 2033) | 12% |
Market Value (2023) | US$ 230.95 million |
Growth Factor | Growing focus on inventory obligations and reducing extra cost on services |
Future Opportunities | Improvements in implementation frameworks and tracking device |
Market Trends | Various end-user industries are developing their own solutions to eliminate third-party providers |
WAN Optimization Controllers Market:
Attributes | WAN Optimization Controllers Market |
---|---|
CAGR (2023 to 2033) | 9% |
Market Value (2023) | US$ 21.8 billion |
Growth Factor | Ever increasing amount of data and the requirement of transferring it over wide networks |
Future Opportunities | Development of multi-WAN connections for maximizing the total bandwidth |
Market Trends | Rising trend of high-performance array appliances along with cloud computing and virtualization |
Mobile Tracking Solution Market:
Attributes | Mobile Tracking Solution Market |
---|---|
CAGR (2023 to 2033) | 20% |
Market Value (2023) | US$ 62.4 billion |
Growth Factor | Proliferation of Mobile assets for the success of any type of commodity-based business |
Future Opportunities | Development and availability of several new types of tracking solutions |
Market Trends | Service providers themselves are marketing and targeting end-users with higher potential |
Currently, many successful WAN connectivity service providers are operating in North America, particularly in the United States. In addition to this, the logistics and transportation sector is also quite developed here in comparison to other countries.
Businesses in the United States and Canada are also known for the earliest adoption of high-end technologies in almost every sector. Owing to all these factors, the United States is projected to remain at the forefront in the adoption of WAN connectivity for remote or returnable transport asset tracking and management.
Europe is known for its higher use of freight and Cargo transporting goods and commodities across several regional and international boundaries. So, this region is believed to have a huge potential for different types of remote asset tracking and management market.
Presently, Germany leads in the demand for WAN connected returnable transport asset tracking services in the European region. Meanwhile, France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom have increased their regional markets substantially in the post-pandemic period.
Asia Pacific is a remarkably growing economic region with transport and logistics being the backbone of many countries. However, countries with suitable infrastructure and digital advancement have only been yet able to adopt WAN connectivity in their existing remote asset-tracking systems.
India and China have emerged to be very promising marketplaces for WAN connected returnable transport asset-tracking service providers. The sheer amount of transport assets operating continuously in these two countries has opened up huge opportunities for regional players as well.
Get the data you need at a Fraction of the cost
Personalize your report by choosing insights you need
and save 40%!
The sheer interconnected nature of the logistics sector has led to the emergence of many regional players for tracking returnable transported assets. However, the unavailability of a certain level of technological advancement has limited the proliferation of WAN connections in this sector in all regions. So, the overall market is fairly consolidated until now, with some leading network companies still dominating the global landscape.
Given the growing emphasis on the establishment of telecommunication and data transfer infrastructures, many start-ups are gearing towards WAN connectivity these days. Hence, encouraging federal policies is anticipated to usher in new market players soon and fragment the market landscape. Moreover, a favorable market climate is poised to intensify the competition for WAN connected returnable transport assets tracking services in the coming days.
A total of US$68.85 million was generated in 2022 by the market.
The market is expected to reach US$ 230.95 million by 2033.
The market is anticipated to expand at a 12% CAGR through 2033.
ActSoft, Inc., Touma Incorporated, and Asset Panda LLC are the leading market players.
On-cloud services are expected to grow the market.
1. Executive Summary | WAN Connected Returnable Transport Asset Tracking Market 1.1. Global Market Outlook 1.2. Demand-side Trends 1.3. Supply-side Trends 1.4. Technology Roadmap Analysis 1.5. Analysis and Recommendations 2. Market Overview 2.1. Market Coverage / Taxonomy 2.2. Market Definition / Scope / Limitations 3. Market Background 3.1. Market Dynamics 3.1.1. Drivers 3.1.2. Restraints 3.1.3. Opportunity 3.1.4. Trends 3.2. Scenario Forecast 3.2.1. Demand in Optimistic Scenario 3.2.2. Demand in Likely Scenario 3.2.3. Demand in Conservative Scenario 3.3. Opportunity Map Analysis 3.4. Investment Feasibility Matrix 3.5. PESTLE and Porter’s Analysis 3.6. Regulatory Landscape 3.6.1. By Key Regions 3.6.2. By Key Countries 3.7. Regional Parent Market Outlook 4. Global Demand of Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast, 2023 to 2033 4.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Analysis, 2018 to 2022 4.2. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ Million) Projections, 2023 to 2033 4.2.1. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis 4.2.2. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis 5. Global Demand of Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Component 5.1. Introduction / Key Findings 5.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Analysis By Component, 2018 to 2022 5.3. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ Million) Analysis and Forecast By Component, 2023 to 2033 5.3.1. Hardware 5.3.2. Software 5.4. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By Component, 2018 to 2022 5.5. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By Component, 2023 to 2033 6. Global Demand of Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Deployment Type 6.1. Introduction / Key Findings 6.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Analysis By Deployment Type, 2018 to 2022 6.3. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ Million) Analysis and Forecast By Deployment Type, 2023 to 2033 6.3.1. On-Cloud 6.3.2. On-premise 6.4. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By Deployment Type, 2018 to 2022 6.5. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By Deployment Type, 2023 to 2033 7. Global Demand of Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By End-user Application 7.1. Introduction / Key Findings 7.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Analysis By End-user Application, 2018 to 2022 7.3. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ Million) Analysis and Forecast By End-user Application, 2023 to 2033 7.3.1. Transportation & Logistics 7.3.2. Aviation 7.3.3. Healthcare 7.3.4. Manufacturing 7.3.5. Food & Beverage 7.4. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By End-user Application, 2018 to 2022 7.5. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By End-user Application, 2023 to 2033 8. Global Demand of Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Region 8.1. Introduction 8.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Analysis By Region, 2018 to 2022 8.3. Current Market Size Value (US$ Million) Analysis and Forecast By Region, 2023 to 2033 8.3.1. North America 8.3.2. Latin America 8.3.3. Europe 8.3.4. South Asia 8.3.5. East Asia 8.3.6. Oceania 8.3.7. MEA 8.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Region 9. North America Demand of Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country 9.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022 9.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033 9.2.1. By Country 9.2.1.1. U.S. 9.2.1.2. Canada 9.2.2. By Component 9.2.3. By Deployment Type 9.2.4. By End-user Application 9.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis 9.3.1. By Country 9.3.2. By Component 9.3.3. By Deployment Type 9.3.4. By End-user Application 9.4. Key Takeaways 10. Latin America Demand of Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country 10.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022 10.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033 10.2.1. By Country 10.2.1.1. Brazil 10.2.1.2. Mexico 10.2.1.3. Rest of Latin America 10.2.2. By Component 10.2.3. By Deployment Type 10.2.4. By End-user Application 10.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis 10.3.1. By Country 10.3.2. By Component 10.3.3. By Deployment Type 10.3.4. By End-user Application 10.4. Key Takeaways 11. Europe Demand of Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country 11.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022 11.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033 11.2.1. By Country 11.2.1.1. Germany 11.2.1.2. UNITED KINGDOM 11.2.1.3. France 11.2.1.4. Spain 11.2.1.5. Italy 11.2.1.6. Rest of Europe 11.2.2. By Component 11.2.3. By Deployment Type 11.2.4. By End-user Application 11.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis 11.3.1. By Country 11.3.2. By Component 11.3.3. By Deployment Type 11.3.4. By End-user Application 11.4. Key Takeaways 12. South Asia Demand of Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country 12.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022 12.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033 12.2.1. By Country 12.2.1.1. India 12.2.1.2. Malaysia 12.2.1.3. Singapore 12.2.1.4. Thailand 12.2.1.5. Rest of South Asia 12.2.2. By Component 12.2.3. By Deployment Type 12.2.4. By End-user Application 12.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis 12.3.1. By Country 12.3.2. By Component 12.3.3. By Deployment Type 12.3.4. By End-user Application 12.4. Key Takeaways 13. East Asia Demand of Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country 13.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022 13.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033 13.2.1. By Country 13.2.1.1. China 13.2.1.2. Japan 13.2.1.3. South Korea 13.2.2. By Component 13.2.3. By Deployment Type 13.2.4. By End-user Application 13.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis 13.3.1. By Country 13.3.2. By Component 13.3.3. By Deployment Type 13.3.4. By End-user Application 13.4. Key Takeaways 14. Oceania Demand of Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country 14.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022 14.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033 14.2.1. By Country 14.2.1.1. Australia 14.2.1.2. New Zealand 14.2.2. By Component 14.2.3. By Deployment Type 14.2.4. By End-user Application 14.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis 14.3.1. By Country 14.3.2. By Component 14.3.3. By Deployment Type 14.3.4. By End-user Application 14.4. Key Takeaways 15. MEA Demand of Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country 15.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022 15.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033 15.2.1. By Country 15.2.1.1. GCC Countries 15.2.1.2. South Africa 15.2.1.3. Israel 15.2.1.4. Rest of MEA 15.2.2. By Component 15.2.3. By Deployment Type 15.2.4. By End-user Application 15.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis 15.3.1. By Country 15.3.2. By Component 15.3.3. By Deployment Type 15.3.4. By End-user Application 15.4. Key Takeaways 16. Key Countries Demand of Analysis 16.1. U.S. 16.1.1. Pricing Analysis 16.1.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.1.2.1. By Component 16.1.2.2. By Deployment Type 16.1.2.3. By End-user Application 16.2. Canada 16.2.1. Pricing Analysis 16.2.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.2.2.1. By Component 16.2.2.2. By Deployment Type 16.2.2.3. By End-user Application 16.3. Brazil 16.3.1. Pricing Analysis 16.3.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.3.2.1. By Component 16.3.2.2. By Deployment Type 16.3.2.3. By End-user Application 16.4. Mexico 16.4.1. Pricing Analysis 16.4.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.4.2.1. By Component 16.4.2.2. By Deployment Type 16.4.2.3. By End-user Application 16.5. Germany 16.5.1. Pricing Analysis 16.5.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.5.2.1. By Component 16.5.2.2. By Deployment Type 16.5.2.3. By End-user Application 16.6. UNITED KINGDOM 16.6.1. Pricing Analysis 16.6.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.6.2.1. By Component 16.6.2.2. By Deployment Type 16.6.2.3. By End-user Application 16.7. France 16.7.1. Pricing Analysis 16.7.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.7.2.1. By Component 16.7.2.2. By Deployment Type 16.7.2.3. By End-user Application 16.8. Spain 16.8.1. Pricing Analysis 16.8.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.8.2.1. By Component 16.8.2.2. By Deployment Type 16.8.2.3. By End-user Application 16.9. Italy 16.9.1. Pricing Analysis 16.9.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.9.2.1. By Component 16.9.2.2. By Deployment Type 16.9.2.3. By End-user Application 16.10. India 16.10.1. Pricing Analysis 16.10.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.10.2.1. By Component 16.10.2.2. By Deployment Type 16.10.2.3. By End-user Application 16.11. Malaysia 16.11.1. Pricing Analysis 16.11.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.11.2.1. By Component 16.11.2.2. By Deployment Type 16.11.2.3. By End-user Application 16.12. Singapore 16.12.1. Pricing Analysis 16.12.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.12.2.1. By Component 16.12.2.2. By Deployment Type 16.12.2.3. By End-user Application 16.13. Thailand 16.13.1. Pricing Analysis 16.13.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.13.2.1. By Component 16.13.2.2. By Deployment Type 16.13.2.3. By End-user Application 16.14. China 16.14.1. Pricing Analysis 16.14.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.14.2.1. By Component 16.14.2.2. By Deployment Type 16.14.2.3. By End-user Application 16.15. Japan 16.15.1. Pricing Analysis 16.15.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.15.2.1. By Component 16.15.2.2. By Deployment Type 16.15.2.3. By End-user Application 16.16. South Korea 16.16.1. Pricing Analysis 16.16.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.16.2.1. By Component 16.16.2.2. By Deployment Type 16.16.2.3. By End-user Application 16.17. Australia 16.17.1. Pricing Analysis 16.17.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.17.2.1. By Component 16.17.2.2. By Deployment Type 16.17.2.3. By End-user Application 16.18. New Zealand 16.18.1. Pricing Analysis 16.18.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.18.2.1. By Component 16.18.2.2. By Deployment Type 16.18.2.3. By End-user Application 16.19. GCC Countries 16.19.1. Pricing Analysis 16.19.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.19.2.1. By Component 16.19.2.2. By Deployment Type 16.19.2.3. By End-user Application 16.20. South Africa 16.20.1. Pricing Analysis 16.20.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.20.2.1. By Component 16.20.2.2. By Deployment Type 16.20.2.3. By End-user Application 16.21. Israel 16.21.1. Pricing Analysis 16.21.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.21.2.1. By Component 16.21.2.2. By Deployment Type 16.21.2.3. By End-user Application 17. Market Structure Analysis 17.1. Competition Dashboard 17.2. Competition Benchmarking 17.3. Market Share Analysis of Top Players 17.3.1. By Regional 17.3.2. By Component 17.3.3. By Deployment Type 17.3.4. By End-user Application 18. Competition Analysis 18.1. Competition Deep Dive 18.1.1. ActSoft, Inc. 18.1.1.1. Overview 18.1.1.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.1.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.1.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.1.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.1.5.1. Marketing Strategy 18.1.2. Touma Incorporated 18.1.2.1. Overview 18.1.2.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.2.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.2.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.2.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.2.5.1. Marketing Strategy 18.1.3. Asset Panda LLC 18.1.3.1. Overview 18.1.3.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.3.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.3.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.3.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.3.5.1. Marketing Strategy 18.1.4. AT&T Inc. 18.1.4.1. Overview 18.1.4.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.4.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.4.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.4.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.4.5.1. Marketing Strategy 18.1.5. GigaTrak 18.1.5.1. Overview 18.1.5.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.5.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.5.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.5.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.5.5.1. Marketing Strategy 18.1.6. OnAsset Intelligence Inc. 18.1.6.1. Overview 18.1.6.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.6.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.6.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.6.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.6.5.1. Marketing Strategy 18.1.7. Oracle Corporation 18.1.7.1. Overview 18.1.7.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.7.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.7.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.7.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.7.5.1. Marketing Strategy 18.1.8. Spireon Inc. 18.1.8.1. Overview 18.1.8.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.8.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.8.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.8.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.8.5.1. Marketing Strategy 18.1.9. Trimble Inc. 18.1.9.1. Overview 18.1.9.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.9.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.9.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.9.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.9.5.1. Marketing Strategy 18.1.10. Zebra Technologies Corporation 18.1.10.1. Overview 18.1.10.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.10.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.10.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.10.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.10.5.1. Marketing Strategy 18.1.11. Verizon Communications Inc. 18.1.11.1. Overview 18.1.11.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.11.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.11.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.11.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.11.5.1. Marketing Strategy 18.1.12. Ubisense limited 18.1.12.1. Overview 18.1.12.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.12.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.12.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.12.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.12.5.1. Marketing Strategy 19. Assumptions & Acronyms Used 20. Research Methodology
Explore Technology Insights
View Reports