In a new research report, Future Market Insights (FMI) finds that sales of dedicated outdoor air systems (DOAS) in the United States hold a current valuation of US$ 1,236.5 million in 2024. Revenue had reached US$ 6,233.0 million in 2023.
Over the forecast period 2024 to 2034, the United States DOAS industry is anticipated to rise at 8.2% CAGR. Demand could surge to US$ 2,708.1 million in 2034.
Demand for DOAS is projected to remain high in the 20 to 40 tons and 50 to 60 tons segments in terms of capacity. The latest United States DOAS industry analysis predicts that the target segments will thrive at 8.0% and 8.7% CAGR, respectively, during the assessment period.
| Attributes | Key Insights |
|---|---|
| United States DOAS Industry Size in 2023 | US$ 6,233.0 million |
| Estimated United States DOAS Industry Value (2024) | US$ 1,236.5 million |
| Projected United States DOAS Industry Revenue (2034) | US$ 2,708.1 million |
| Value-based CAGR (2024 to 2034) | 8.2% |
Don't pay for what you don't need
Customize your report by selecting specific countries or regions and save 30%!
Industry to Expand around 2.2X through 2034
An expected increase in CAGR compared to the historical one by 2.3% is likely to lead to at least a 2.2x expansion of the United States DOAS industry through 2034. Increasing awareness of indoor air quality (IAQ) will likely propel the industry.
DOAS is likely to be added to building automation control systems (BACS) to improve HVAC performance and building efficiency. It also provides reliability while being able to communicate with the BAS platforms used, increasing their efficiency and reliability.
DOAS deployments combined with IoT devices and smart building technologies are gaining popularity. These enable remote monitoring and optimization of air quality & energy efficiency.
Customers and facility managers are looking for DOAS solutions that can easily fit a complete building management system with comprehensive performance analysis and predictive maintenance functions. Changes in construction, energy consumption, and IAQ-related regulations impact requirements.
Regulations aimed at reducing energy consumption and improving air quality are set to propel demand. DOAS programs are required to meet current regulatory conditions but can be adapted to changing future standards to maintain long-term durability and ensure compliance.
West United States to Remain the Hotbed for DOAS Manufacturers
West United States is expected to rise substantially in the United States DOAS industry during the forecast period. It is set to hold around 35.2% of the share in 2034.
The vast geographical range across Western United States plays a key role in increasing the need for advanced DOAS HVAC systems. This is because the area spans from dry deserts to temperate coastal lands. Hence, the region requires climate control structures that can adapt to a wide range of environmental situations. This has made the system an attractive option among homeowners and firms due to its versatility & efficiency.
Strict environmental regulations that exist in Western United States are set to propel the adoption of DOAS. To reduce emissions while improving energy usage, state and local governments have enacted stringent building codes and green standards. The system emerges as a solution that is compliant with all regulations.
Demand is further encouraged by exponential growth of urban centers in Western United States. In Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Seattle, there has been an influx of commercial development that calls for DOAS system HVAC to accommodate infrastructures. It becomes the keystone of contemporary buildings aimed at ensuring optimum indoor air quality and enhanced occupant comfort amid city growth.
Healthcare Sector becomes a Key Consumer of DOAS
In the healthcare industry, where patient well-being and infection prevention are significant, DOAS plays an important role in maintaining a sterile environment. It also helps in preventing the spread of airborne pollutants.
Hospitals, clinics, and pharmacies rely on DOAS to provide increased ventilation and filtration to patients, staff, and guests. To ensure a comfortable and healthy indoor environment, advanced features such as heat recovery and air purification enhance efficiency.
Sales of DOAS in the United States grew at a CAGR of 3.1% between 2019 and 2023. Total industry revenue reached about US$ 1,146.6 million in 2023. In the forecast period, the United States DOAS industry is set to thrive at a CAGR of 8.2%.
| Historical CAGR (2019 to 2023) | 3.1% |
|---|---|
| Forecast CAGR (2024 to 2034) | 8.2% |
Increased awareness of air quality, strict environmental standards, and need for more flexible DOAS in HVAC are set to augment demand. Innovations in technology have led to the development of efficient and sophisticated solutions.
Innovations include heat recovery, unique filtration options, and smart controls to improve system efficiency and energy savings. The forecast period will likely see high adoption of green building practices, which will propel demand for energy-efficient solutions such as DOAS.
Principal Consultant
Regulatory Compliance and Standards
Regulatory requirements and standards mandating minimum air concentrations & IAQ standards in buildings are pushing the adoption of DOAS with ERV. Building codes, such as ASHRAE standards and local codes, often specify ventilation requirements that must be met to ensure occupant health and safety.
New solutions with the ability to provide outdoor ventilation and reduce energy consumption provide an attractive way to comply with this code. Mitsubishi Electric Trane HVAC US (METUS) provides DOAS systems that meet or exceed regulatory requirements.
By providing solutions that help building owners comply with building codes and standards, companies like METUS have established themselves as trusted partners.
High Initial Investments for DOAS
Compared to traditional HVAC systems, DOAS typically involves higher upfront costs due to the need for specialized equipment such as energy recovery ventilators, advanced filtration systems, and sophisticated controls. Additionally, retrofitting existing buildings with these systems can require significant modifications to the building's infrastructure.
These include ductwork, ventilation pathways, and control systems. High initial costs may deter certain building owners and operators, particularly those with limited budgets or stringent financial constraints, from adopting these systems.
Complexity of Design and Installation of DOAS
The United States DOAS industry consists of complex policies and procedures associated with these systems. The system often requires careful technical and design considerations to ensure efficiency, effectiveness, and compatibility with existing building systems.
The DOAS design process involves adequate air volume, airflow distribution, and large equipment. It depends on factors such as building size, occupancy, climate, and indoor air quality requirements.
Establishing a DOAS can be challenging due to the need to collaborate with other building systems, comply with regulatory requirements, and integrate with existing infrastructure. Complex design can be a barrier for a construction project, especially for those with limited technical expertise or resources.
Get the data you need at a Fraction of the cost
Personalize your report by choosing insights you need
and save 40%!
The table below highlights key states in the United States DOAS industry. California, Texas, and Florida are expected to remain the top three consumers of DOAS air systems, with expected valuations of US$ 302.7 million, US$ 246.8 million, and US$ 144.4 million, respectively, in 2034.
| States | United States DOAS Industry Revenue (2034) |
|---|---|
| California | US$ 302.7 million |
| Texas | US$ 246.8 million |
| Florida | US$ 144.4 million |
| New York | US$ 122.1 million |
| Georgia | US$ 80.2 million |
The table below shows the estimated growth rates of several states in the United States DOAS industry. Georgia, Texas, and New York are set to record high CAGRs of 9.7%, 8.8%, and 8.2%, respectively, through 2034.
| States | Projected CAGR (2024 to 2034) |
|---|---|
| Georgia | 9.7% |
| Texas | 8.8% |
| Florida | 8.6% |
| New York | 8.2% |
| California | 7.8% |
California is a key state in terms of technology and innovations. Silicon Valley serves as a global hub for cutting-edge research & development in a variety of industries, including sensing and technology.
The state’s vibrant ecosystem of start-ups and research institutions creates a favorable environment for advancing HVAC DOAS technology. It stimulates innovation and pushes the boundaries of possibilities in optical & sensing applications.
California’s diverse geographic and environmental conditions provide several opportunities to implement DOAS programs in a variety of settings. It includes urban environments, rural landscapes, coastal areas, and mountainous areas.
Sales of DOAS in California are projected to soar at a CAGR of around 7.8% during the assessment period. Total valuation in the state is anticipated to reach US$ 302.7 million by 2034.
Texas has a diverse economy characterized by a strong presence in the manufacturing, industrial, energy, wind, and aerospace industries. The state's well-established technology base provides a strong foundation for DOAS operations. It provides skilled labor, supplies, and support services needed for manufacturing.
Texas has a great deal of talent, including engineers, scientists, and technicians These skilled personnel are essential for the designing, development, and execution of DOAS systems to ensure smooth manufacturing and extraction of new manufacturing processes.
Texas offers a favorable climate, including business-friendly regulations, low taxes, and incentives for manufacturing investments. The state’s pro-business policies and commitment to economic development attract companies seeking to establish production. It is creating a favorable environment for DOAS entrepreneurs to succeed.
The section below shows the commercial segment dominating by end-use. It is likely to thrive at a 7.9% CAGR between 2024 and 2034.
Based on capacity, the 40 to 60 ton segment is anticipated to hold a dominant share through 2034. It is set to exhibit a CAGR of 8.2% during the forecast period.
| Top Segment (End-use) | Commercial |
|---|---|
| Predicted CAGR (2024 to 2034) | 7.9% |
Based on end-use, the United States DOAS industry is segmented into commercial, residential, and industrial. Among these, the commercial category stands out as the dominant force, significantly influencing the industry’s landscape.
Commercial buildings are subject to stringent regulations and standards for safety, security, and environmental performance. Compliance with these regulations often requires the use of advanced monitoring and control systems, including DOAS solutions. The programs enable owners and operators to meet regulatory requirements while ensuring the well-being of their residents and reducing operational risks.
| Top Segment (Capacity) | 40 to 60 Tons |
|---|---|
| Projected CAGR (2024 to 2034) | 8.2% |
DOAS in the 40 to 60 ton capacity range is robust to meet the air conditioning needs of medium to large commercial buildings. It is also flexible to be used in a variety of environments such as offices, schools, hospitals, and manufacturing facilities.
The capacity is ideal for large mid-rise buildings where DOAS is required to maintain indoor air quality and comfort. Systems in this capacity are typically designed to be more energy efficient, helping building owners and operators reduce operating costs and meet sustainability goals. They typically use unique features such as variable-speed compressors and air recovery to improve efficiency.
Tier 1 players account for around 40 to 44% of the share and a revenue of more than US$ 200 million in the United States. These players include Johnson Controls, Modine Manufacturing, Lennox International, Carrier United States Corporation, AAON, Munters Corporation, Trane Technologies, and Daikin Industries.
Tier 2 players include Desert Aire, Greenheck Fan Corporation, RenewAire, Nortek Air Solutions, DRI Innovative Solution, and FlaktGroup SEMCO. Other regional and local players are set to hold 56 to 60% of the industry share.
Leading DOAS manufacturers are focusing on investing in research & development activities to come up with innovative products. They are also participating in several exhibitions to showcase their latest products and gain a large customer base.
Recent Developments in the United States DOAS Industry
| Attribute | Details |
|---|---|
| Estimated Industry Size (2024) | US$ 1,236.5 million |
| Projected Industry Size (2034) | US$ 2,708.1 million |
| Anticipated Growth Rate (2024 to 2034) | 8.2% |
| Historical Data | 2019 to 2023 |
| Forecast Period | 2024 to 2034 |
| Quantitative Units | Value (US$ million) and Volume (Units) |
| Report Coverage | Revenue Forecast, Volume Forecast, Company Ranking, Competitive Landscape, Growth Factors, Trends, and Pricing Analysis |
| Industry Segments Covered | Capacity, Implementation Type, Requirement, End-use, Region |
| Regions Covered | Northeast United States; Southeast United States; Southwest United States; Midwest United States; West United States |
| Key Countries Covered | Pennsylvania, New York, Massachusetts, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia, Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, Illinois, Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, California, Texas, Colorado, Washington |
| Key Companies Profiled | Trane Technologies; Carrier Global Corporation; Johnson Controls; Daikin Industries; DRI Innovative Solution; Nortek Air Solutions; Lennox International; AAON; Desert Aire; Greenheck Fan Corporation; Munters Corporation; Ruskin Company; Modine Manufacturing; SEMCO; RenewAire. |
The United States DOAS industry was valued at US$ 1,146.6 million in 2023.
The United States industry value is set to reach US$ 1,236.5 million in 2024.
The United States DOAS industry is anticipated to rise at 8.2% CAGR.
The United States DOAS industry is set to reach US$ 2,708.1 million by 2034.
Commercial segment is expected to lead the industry during the forecast period.
DOAS stands for dedicated outdoor air system.
The global DOAS industry is likely to be valued at US$ 11.4 billion in 2034.
DOAS supplies outdoor air, whereas RTUs provide air directly from the outside.
1. Executive Summary 1.1. United States Industry Outlook 1.2. Demand Side Trends 1.3. Supply Side Trends 1.4. Technology Roadmap 1.5. Analysis and Recommendations 2. Industry Overview 2.1. Industry Coverage / Taxonomy 2.2. Industry Definition / Scope / Limitations 3. Key Industry Trends 3.1. Key Trends Impacting the Industry 3.2. Product Innovation / Development Trends 4. Key Success Factors 4.1. Product Adoption / Usage Analysis 4.2. Product USPs / Features 4.3. Strategic Promotional Strategies 5. Industry Demand Analysis 2019 to 2023 and Forecast, 2024 to 2034 5.1. Historical Industry Volume (Units) Analysis, 2019 to 2023 5.2. Current and Future Industry Volume (Units) Projections, 2024 to 2034 5.3. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis 6. Industry - Pricing Analysis 6.1. Regional Pricing Analysis By Capacity 6.2. United States Average Pricing Analysis Benchmark 7. Industry Demand (in Value or Size in US$ million) Analysis 2019 to 2023 and Forecast, 2024 to 2034 7.1. Historical Industry Value (US$ million) Analysis, 2019 to 2023 7.2. Current and Future Industry Value (US$ million) Projections, 2024 to 2034 7.2.1. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis 7.2.2. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis 8. Industry Background 8.1. Macro-Economic Factors 8.1.1. United States GDP Growth Outlook 8.1.2. United States Industry Overview 8.1.3. Manufacturing Value-Added 8.1.4. Industry Value Added 8.1.5. Other Macro-Economic Factors 8.2. Forecast Factors - Relevance & Impact 8.2.1. Top Companies Historical Growth 8.2.2. GDP Growth Forecast 8.2.3. Manufacturing Industry Forecast 8.2.4. United States Urbanization Growth Outlook 8.2.5. End-use Industry Growth Outlook 8.2.6. Other Forecast Factors 8.3. Value Chain 8.3.1. Product Manufacturers 8.3.2. End Users 8.3.3. Avg. Profitability Margins 8.4. COVID-19 Crisis - Impact Assessment 8.4.1. Current Statistics 8.4.2. Short-Mid-Long Term Outlook 8.4.3. Likely Rebound 8.5. Industry Dynamics 8.5.1. Drivers 8.5.2. Restraints 8.5.3. Opportunity Analysis 8.6. PESTLE Analysis 8.7. Key Development 9. Industry Analysis 2019 to 2023 and Forecast 2024 to 2034, By Capacity 9.1. Introduction / Key Findings 9.2. Historical Industry Size (US$ million) and Volume Analysis By Capacity, 2019 to 2023 9.3. Current and Future Industry Size (US$ million) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By Capacity, 2024 to 2034 9.3.1. Less Than 20 Units 9.3.2. 20 to 40 Units 9.3.3. 40 to 60 Units 9.3.4. Greater Than 60 Units 9.4. Industry Attractiveness Analysis By Capacity 10. Industry Analysis 2019 to 2023 and Forecast 2024 to 2034, By Implementation 10.1. Introduction / Key Findings 10.2. Historical Industry Size (US$ million) and Volume Analysis By Implementation, 2019 to 2023 10.3. Current and Future Industry Size (US$ million) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By Implementation, 2024 to 2034 10.3.1. New Construction 10.3.2. Retrofit 10.4. Industry Attractiveness Analysis By Implementation 11. Industry Analysis 2019 to 2023 and Forecast 2024 to 2034, By Requirement 11.1. Introduction / Key Findings 11.2. Historical Industry Size (US$ million) and Volume Analysis By Requirement, 2019 to 2023 11.3. Current and Future Industry Size (US$ million) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By Requirement, 2024 to 2034 11.3.1. Heating 11.3.2. Ventilation 11.3.3. Cooling 11.3.4. Dehumidification 11.4. Industry Attractiveness Analysis By Requirement 12. Industry Analysis 2019 to 2023 and Forecast 2024 to 2034, By End-use 12.1. Introduction / Key Findings 12.2. Historical Industry Size (US$ million) and Volume Analysis By End-use, 2019 to 2023 12.3. Current and Future Industry Size (US$ million) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By End-use, 2024 to 2034 12.3.1. Commercial 12.3.2. Residential 12.3.3. Industrial 12.4. Industry Attractiveness Analysis By End-use 13. Industry Analysis 2019 to 2023 and Forecast 2024 to 2034, by Region 13.1. Introduction 13.2. Historical Industry Size (US$ million) and Volume Analysis By Region, 2019 to 2023 13.3. Current Industry Size (US$ million) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By Region, 2024 to 2034 13.3.1. Northeast United States 13.3.2. Southeast United States 13.3.3. Southwest United States 13.3.4. Midwest United States 13.3.5. West United States 13.4. Industry Attractiveness Analysis By Region 14. Northeast Industry Analysis 2019 to 2023 and Forecast 2024 to 2034 14.1. Introduction 14.2. Pricing Analysis 14.3. Historical Industry Size (US$ million) and Volume Trend Analysis By Industry Taxonomy, 2019 to 2023 14.4. Industry Size (US$ million) and Volume Forecast By Industry Taxonomy, 2024 to 2034 14.4.1. By Sub-region 14.4.1.1. Pennsylvania 14.4.1.2. New York 14.4.1.3. Massachusetts 14.4.1.4. Rest of Northeast United States 14.4.2. By Capacity 14.4.3. By Implementation 14.4.4. By Requirement 14.4.5. By End-use 14.5. Industry Attractiveness Analysis 14.5.1. By Sub-region 14.5.2. By Capacity 14.5.3. By Implementation 14.5.4. By Requirement 14.5.5. By End-use 14.6. Industry Trends 14.7. Key Industry Participants - Intensity Mapping 14.8. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis 15. Southeast Industry Analysis 2019 to 2023 and Forecast 2024 to 2034 15.1. Introduction 15.2. Pricing Analysis 15.3. Historical Industry Size (US$ million) and Volume Trend Analysis By Industry Taxonomy, 2019 to 2023 15.4. Industry Size (US$ million) and Volume Forecast By Industry Taxonomy, 2024 to 2034 15.4.1. By Sub-region 15.4.1.1. Florida 15.4.1.2. Georgia 15.4.1.3. North Carolina 15.4.1.4. Virginia 15.4.1.5. Rest of Southeast United States 15.4.2. By Capacity 15.4.3. By Implementation 15.4.4. By Requirement 15.4.5. By End-use 15.5. Industry Attractiveness Analysis 15.5.1. By Sub-region 15.5.2. By Capacity 15.5.3. By Implementation 15.5.4. By Requirement 15.5.5. By End-use 15.6. Industry Trends 15.7. Key Industry Participants - Intensity Mapping 15.8. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis 16. Southwest Industry Analysis 2019 to 2023 and Forecast 2024 to 2034 16.1. Introduction 16.2. Pricing Analysis 16.3. Historical Industry Size (US$ million) and Volume Trend Analysis By Industry Taxonomy, 2019 to 2023 16.4. Industry Size (US$ million) and Volume Forecast By Industry Taxonomy, 2024 to 2034 16.4.1. By Sub-region 16.4.1.1. Arizona 16.4.1.2. New Mexico 16.4.1.3. Nevada 16.4.1.4. Utah 16.4.1.5. Rest of Southwest United States 16.4.2. By Capacity 16.4.3. By Implementation 16.4.4. By Requirement 16.4.5. By End-use 16.5. Industry Attractiveness Analysis 16.5.1. By Sub-region 16.5.2. By Capacity 16.5.3. By Implementation 16.5.4. By Requirement 16.5.5. By End-use 16.6. Industry Trends 16.7. Key Industry Participants - Intensity Mapping 16.8. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis 17. Midwest Industry Analysis 2019 to 2023 and Forecast 2024 to 2034 17.1. Introduction 17.2. Pricing Analysis 17.3. Historical Industry Size (US$ million) and Volume Trend Analysis By Industry Taxonomy, 2019 to 2023 17.4. Industry Size (US$ million) and Volume Forecast By Industry Taxonomy, 2024 to 2034 17.4.1. By Sub-region 17.4.1.1. Illinois 17.4.1.2. Ohio 17.4.1.3. Michigan 17.4.1.4. Indiana 17.4.1.5. Rest of Midwest United States 17.4.2. By Capacity 17.4.3. By Implementation 17.4.4. By Requirement 17.4.5. By End-use 17.5. Industry Attractiveness Analysis 17.5.1. By Sub-region 17.5.2. By Capacity 17.5.3. By Implementation 17.5.4. By Requirement 17.5.5. By End-use 17.6. Industry Trends 17.7. Key Industry Participants - Intensity Mapping 17.8. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis 18. West Industry Analysis 2019 to 2023 and Forecast 2024 to 2034 18.1. Introduction 18.2. Pricing Analysis 18.3. Historical Industry Size (US$ million) and Volume Trend Analysis By Industry Taxonomy, 2019 to 2023 18.4. Industry Size (US$ million) and Volume Forecast By Industry Taxonomy, 2024 to 2034 18.4.1. By Sub-region 18.4.1.1. California 18.4.1.2. Texas 18.4.1.3. Colorado 18.4.1.4. Washington 18.4.1.5. Rest of West United States 18.4.2. By Capacity 18.4.3. By Implementation 18.4.4. By Requirement 18.4.5. By End-use 18.5. Industry Attractiveness Analysis 18.5.1. By Sub-region 18.5.2. By Capacity 18.5.3. By Implementation 18.5.4. By Requirement 18.5.5. By End-use 18.6. Industry Trends 18.7. Key Industry Participants - Intensity Mapping 18.8. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis 19. Sub-region-wise Industry Analysis 19.1. Introduction 19.1.1. Industry Value Proportion Analysis, By Key Countries 19.1.2. United States Vs. Sub-region Growth Comparison 19.2. Pennsylvania. Industry Analysis 19.2.1. By Capacity 19.2.2. By Implementation 19.2.3. By Requirement 19.2.4. By End-use 19.3. New York Industry Analysis 19.3.1. By Capacity 19.3.2. By Implementation 19.3.3. By Requirement 19.3.4. By End-use 19.4. Massachusetts Industry Analysis 19.4.1. By Capacity 19.4.2. By Implementation 19.4.3. By Requirement 19.4.4. By End-use 19.5. Florida Industry Analysis 19.5.1. By Capacity 19.5.2. By Implementation 19.5.3. By Requirement 19.5.4. By End-use 19.6. Georgia Industry Analysis 19.6.1. By Capacity 19.6.2. By Implementation 19.6.3. By Requirement 19.6.4. By End-use 19.7. North Carolina Industry Analysis 19.7.1. By Capacity 19.7.2. By Implementation 19.7.3. By Requirement 19.7.4. By End-use 19.8. Virginia Industry Analysis 19.8.1. By Capacity 19.8.2. By Implementation 19.8.3. By Requirement 19.8.4. By End-use 19.9. Arizona Industry Analysis 19.9.1. By Capacity 19.9.2. By Implementation 19.9.3. By Requirement 19.9.4. By End-use 19.10. New Mexico Industry Analysis 19.10.1. By Capacity 19.10.2. By Implementation 19.10.3. By Requirement 19.10.4. By End-use 19.11. Nevada Industry Analysis 19.11.1. By Capacity 19.11.2. By Implementation 19.11.3. By Requirement 19.11.4. By End-use 19.12. Utah Industry Analysis 19.12.1. By Capacity 19.12.2. By Implementation 19.12.3. By Requirement 19.12.4. By End-use 19.13. Illinois Industry Analysis 19.13.1. By Capacity 19.13.2. By Implementation 19.13.3. By Requirement 19.13.4. By End-use 19.14. Ohio Industry Analysis 19.14.1. By Capacity 19.14.2. By Implementation 19.14.3. By Requirement 19.14.4. By End-use 19.15. Michigan Industry Analysis 19.15.1. By Capacity 19.15.2. By Implementation 19.15.3. By Requirement 19.15.4. By End-use 19.16. Indiana Industry Analysis 19.16.1. By Capacity 19.16.2. By Implementation 19.16.3. By Requirement 19.16.4. By End-use 20. Industry Structure Analysis 20.1. Industry Analysis by Tier of Companies 20.2. Industry Concentration 20.3. Industry Share Analysis of Top Players 20.4. Production Capacity Analysis 20.5. Industry Presence Analysis 20.5.1. By Product Footprint of Players 20.5.2. By Regional Footprint of Players 20.5.3. By Application Footprint of Players 21. Competition Analysis 21.1. Competition Dashboard 21.2. Competition Benchmarking 21.3. Competition Deep Dive 21.3.1. Trane Technologies 21.3.1.1. Overview 21.3.1.2. Product Portfolio 21.3.1.3. Profitability by Industry Segments (Product/Channel/Region) 21.3.1.4. Sales Footprint 21.3.1.5. Strategy Overview 21.3.2. Carrier Global Corporation 21.3.3. Johnson Controls 21.3.4. Daikin Industries 21.3.5. DRI Innovative Solution 21.3.6. Nortek Air Solutions 21.3.7. Lennox International 21.3.8. AAON 21.3.9. Desert Aire 21.3.10. Greenheck Fan Corporation 21.3.11. Munters Corporation 21.3.12. Ruskin Company 21.3.13. Modine Manufacturing 21.3.14. SEMCO 21.3.15. RenewAire 21.3.16. Other Key Players 22. Assumptions and Acronyms Used 23. Research Methodology
Industrial Automation
February 2024
REP-GB-18974
310 pages
Explore Industrial Automation Insights
View Reports
DOAS Industry Analysis in the United States
