[300 Pages Report] The number of flexitarians is rapidly increasing, thus propelling the demand for texturized vegetable protein products. As a result of increasing incidence of chronic ailments, consumers are shifting towards healthy food choices. A significant number of these conditions are considered preventable with healthy diets and few lifestyle changes. As a result of the increasing health awareness, the demand for texturized vegetable proteins is set to increase. Also consumer preference for high protein diet has been favoring the overall expansion.
In its new study, ESOMAR-certified market research and consulting firm Future Market Insights (FMI) offers insights about key factors driving demand for texturized vegetable protein. The report tracks the global sales of texturized vegetable protein products in 20+ high-growth markets, along with analyzing the impact COVID-19 has had on the food industry in general, and texturized vegetable protein products in particular.
Don't pay for what you don't need
Customize your report by selecting specific countries or regions and save 30%!
Over the past few years, there has been an increasing shift towards vegetarianism among consumers. This trend has positively affected the demand for plant-based products such as texturized vegetable protein products. In 2008, according to the Vegetarian Times Magazine, over 7.3 million adults in the U.S. were vegetarians, which is 3.2% of the total population. With the number of consumers following vegetarian or flexitarian diet set to rise in the coming years, the demand for texturized vegetable protein is expected to scale higher.
Texturized vegetable protein has emerged as a replacement for proteins such as whey protein, meat protein, egg protein, and others for consumers favoring the vegan trend. Some of the leading names in the food sector have already joined the bandwagon, paving way for the growth of the market. For instance, Beyond Meat uses soy protein with non-genetically modified soy in its chicken-free strips. Consumers are now following the new trend of consuming food containing texturized vegetable protein such as yoghurt smoothies, breakfast cereals, Bakery products and many more.
The increasing demand for texturized vegetable protein has led to the emergence and presence of a significantly high number of domestic and small-scale texturized vegetable protein manufacturers across the globe. Moreover, their increasing presence across online platforms has bode well for the overall market. FMI has forecast the texturized vegetable protein market to exhibit 6.5% CAGR between 2021 and 2031 in comparison to 5.8% registered between 2016 and 2020 as focus towards healthy lifestyle increases.
Along with health consciousness among consumers, their preferences are evolving. As a result they are inclining towards consuming food where no animal is harmed and that causes less environmental damages. This trend has catapulted texturized vegetable protein products to the fore of retail shelves. The growing acceptance of veganism has been aiding overall expansion. According to the Plant Based Foods Association, the retail sales of plant-based foods in the U.S. increased by 11.4% in the past year. Also the increasing demand for vegan, gluten free, and nutrition rich sources of protein has been favoring the surging sales.
Principal Consultant
Texturized vegetable proteins are easier to digest as compared to other animal-derived proteins, which also includes dairy products such as whey protein. For instance, pea protein is naturally high in branched chain amino acids- leucine, isoleucine and valine (BCCAAs). Its chemical structure is absorbed and catabolized (broken down for energy) within the muscle. This aspect is particularly important to athletes and fitness enthusiasts, which has resulted into increasing demand for texturized vegetable protein nutrition.
The popularity of texturized vegetable protein is increasing among food manufacturers, as it is a clean label ingredient. According to the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA), regulations for Label Claims for Conventional Foods and Dietary Supplements has to be followed by every texturized vegetable protein manufacturer in this market. A food label of texturized vegetable protein should contain information describing the food product and ingredients used. Because textured vegetable protein are derived from plant-based sources they are considered ideal candidate clean label.
Get the data you need at a Fraction of the cost
Personalize your report by choosing insights you need
and save 40%!
Increasing healthcare cost has been compelling consumers to follow a healthy lifestyle to improve immunity against chronic ailments. Consequently, there is rising demand for protein derived plant-based sources. Besides this, the rising incidence of various chronic ailments has been supporting the overall expansion of the market.
Consumers across some of the mature markets have been focusing on diet control, thanks to high prevalence of obesity, diabetes, heart ailments, and other chronic diseases. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the prevalence of obesity in the U.S. stood at 42.4% in 2017-2018 and the estimated annual medical cost of obesity in the U.S. was recorded at US$ 147 Bn in 2008. Since then healthcare spending has significantly increased, compelling consumers to focus on healthier lifestyle and rethink about their food habits.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), diabetes continues to be a major cause of heart attacks, stroke, kidney failure, and other chronic diseases. Besides this, the WHO has found that cardiovascular diseases account for nearly 17.9 million deaths worldwide each year. With the burden of various chronic ailments rising, coupled with increasing healthcare costs, more consumers are likely to shift towards a healthier living, creating prospects for textured vegetable protein sales.
As consumer interest and demand for new products increases, a reduction in the consumption of meat will be observed. One approach is to develop meat analogues which will be similar in taste and texture just like meat itself individual focus towards the development of texture and taste must be considered by texturized vegetable protein manufacturers, as consumer approach towards product texture and savory aspects vary significantly.
Further in developing countries, young consumers are now demanding more of clean labeled protein as sport nutrition. This also leads to an opportunity for texturized vegetable protein.
How big is the Opportunity in US Texturized Vegetable Protein?
FMI has projected North America to remain one of the most lucrative texturized vegetable protein markets throughout the course of the forecast period. One of the key factors supporting expansion of texturized vegetable protein is the U.S. is increasing per capita consumption expenditure is due to rising awareness about health-related issues. Further it is estimated that increasing per capita expenditure on beverages will continue supporting growth of the texturized vegetable protein industry.
U.S. remains one of the largest markets for texturized vegetable protein in the world, which invariably makes it a lucrative pocket for manufacturers. The U.S. accounted for 91.7% of the North America market for texturized vegetable protein in 2019. The increasing demand for natural ingredients is an opportunity for the manufacturers to expand their portfolio over the forecast period. In the meantime, increasing vegan population in the U.S. will immensely support sales of plant-based protein. According to a survey (sample size – 1,033) conducted by Gallup in 2018, 3% of Americans said that they were vegans. With vegan population set to rise in America, the demand for texturized vegetable proteins will increase in the coming years.
How big is the Opportunity in China Texturized Vegetable Protein?
FMI has projected China to remain one of the most lucrative markets in East Asia throughout the course of the forecast period. The rising incidence of various chronic diseases, besides high prevalence of obesity in China has been contributing towards changing eating patterns among consumers. According to the World Heart Federation, non-communicable diseases including heart diseases are expected to cause 87% of mortality in China.
A National Health Commission report, released in China in 2020 has found that more than half of adults in the country can be classified as overweight, of whom nearly 16.4% are overweight. The rising prevalence of obesity, besides cardiovascular ailments has been pushing for healthier lifestyle, creating growth opportunities for the market in China.
How big is the Opportunity in Germany Texturized Vegetable Protein?
In recent years, the vegan population in Germany has rapidly expanded. Much of the vegan population sees veganism as a lifestyle choice, not just a dietary restriction. An increase in desired wellness resulted in changes in consumer diets, facilitating the rise texturized vegetable protein among the German population, that is increasingly concerned about animal welfare, the environment, and, especially, their health. Besides this, the presence of companies such as Cargill Inc. has been supporting expansion in Germany.
How Big is Opportunity for Texturized Vegetable Sales in India?
According to the National Diabetes and Diabetic Retinopathy Survey Report, the prevalence of diabetes in India stood at 11.8%. Diabetes and diabetic retinopathy have emerged as a significant non-communicable disease, resulting in ocular morbidity. With the incidence of various chronic ailments showing no signs of slowing down, an increasing number of people are likely to adopt food promoting a better health.
A survey conducted by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization has indicated that India has more number of vegetarians than rest of the world put together. With an increasing number of consumers adopting a vegetarian lifestyle, India will make for a lucrative market for texturized vegetable sales.
What Supports Texturized Vegetable Protein Sales in U.K.?
The U.K. is expected to remain one of the key markets for texturized vegetable protein. The high prevalence of diabetes has been supporting sales in the country. According to the Diabetes.co.uk statistics, the prevalence of diabetes in the country is forecast to touch 5 million by the end of 2025. While mortality because of heart diseases is on decline, it continues to pose immense burden on the country. Consequently, focus on plant-based sources of protein as a key ingredient in food products has greatly increased. This has been creating attractive opportunities for sales in the U.K.
Why is Soy Protein More Preferred as Texturized Vegetable Protein?
The soy protein segment is expected to hold 70.0% of global texturized vegetable protein market in 2030. Soy protein is known to have several health benefits. Most importantly it is considered to be a safer alternative for meat protein, aiding in muscle building. It is also known to have 9 essential amino acids and provide a multitude of functional benefits to food processors. Also the rising popularity of natural soy products such as tempeh, tofu, edamame, and soy milk has been aiding the overall expansion of the segment.
Which Form of Texturized Vegetable Protein is More in Demand?
Granules form is expected to hold 29.0% in 2030 share globally. Texturized vegetable protein -based products are mainly called meal replacements. Texturized vegetable protein in granules form is used in cereals, chili, stews and other snack products.
Which End User is Exhibiting High Demand for Texturized Vegetable Protein?
The food industry is expected to hold the maximum share of the market through the forecast period. Within the food sector, the meat analogues segment is expected to showcase high demand for texturized vegetable protein. The increasing demand for protein derived from plant-based sources has been creating growth opportunities within the industry.
Which Distributions Channel is More Preferred?
Direct distribution channel holds maximum share in the market. Direct distribution channel make it possible for the manufacturers to know their buyers and their behavior towards the product. However, over the forecast period the sales via indirect channels have been expected to improve as well.
Competitive Landscape
Global texturized vegetable protein is primarily characterized by presence of a large number of local, regional and multinational companies. Regional players are relatively highly concentrated in texturized vegetable protein as compared to local players and multinational players. Moreover, regional players are trying to increase their reach across the world. Established players on the other hand are strengthening their position by acquiring local players. This is also intended to have a powerful product portfolio. Besides this, they have been adopting various strategies for expansion such as building new facilities.
For instance, Cargill Inc., in January 2017, started construction of a new US$ 60 Mn protein business headquarters in Wichita, U.S. to increase its protein production. Cargill Inc., the largest company in the USA, has grown to one of the world's top producers and distributors of agricultural products and will continue to grow in its sector and win the hearts of people.
In 2017, E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co, launched SUPRO XT 55 which is an isolated Soy Protein which will help manufacturers of beverages to maintain protein costs with the on-going trend of consuming plant- based protein.
In 2020, MGP Ingredients, Inc, announces a new product line “ProTerra” in the texturized vegetable protein market. ProTerra offered a new range of textured pea with TruTex (textured wheat).
Some of the leading companies operating in the texturized vegetable protein market are:
*The list is not exhaustive, and only for representational purposes. Full competitive intelligence with SWOT analysis available in the report.
| Attribute | Details |
|---|---|
| Forecast Period | 2015 to 2030 |
| Historical Data Available for | 2015 to 2019 |
| Market Analysis | USD Million for value and Metric Tons for Volume |
| Key Regions Covered | North America; Latin America; Europe; East Asia; South Asia; Oceania Middle East & Africa |
| Key Countries Covered | USA, Canada, Germany, UK, France, Italy, Spain, Poland, Russia, China, Japan, South Korea, India, Thailand, Malaysia, Vietnam, Indonesia, Australia, New Zealand, GCC Countries, Turkey, Northern Africa, South Africa |
| Key Segments Covered | Product Type, Nature, Form, End Users, Distribution Channel, Regions |
| Key Companies Profiled | Archer Daniels Midland Company; CHS Inc.; Roquette Frères; Beneo GmbH; Danisco A/S; Vestkron A/S; Cargill Inc.; FUJI OIL CO., LTD.; Puris Proteins, LLC.; MGP Ingredients, Inc.; Crown Soya Protein Group; Sotexpro SA; Wilmar International Ltd.; Gushen Biotechnology Group Co., Ltd.; Ingredion Inc. |
| Report Coverage | Market Forecast, brand share analysis, competition intelligence, DROT analysis, Market Dynamics and Challenges, Strategic Growth Initiatives |
| Customization & Pricing | Available upon Request |
Product Type:
Nature:
Form:
End Users:
Distribution Channel:
Region:
The U.S. currently leads the global market for texturized vegetable protein. Sales in U.S. will account for over 91.7% of total demand in North America.
Soy protein is highly sought-after among products available. Soy protein is expected to continue leading the market for texturized vegetable protein through 2031. Other than soy and pea, proteins such as faba bean, lentil, and corn are also available in the market.
Industrial sector remains the leading end user of texturized vegetable protein as application continues to rise in bakery, snacks, ready meals, sports nutrition, clinical nutrition, baby food, meat analogues and others.
Granules form is expected to hold maximum share in the market due to their increasing application in various food products such as cereals, snacks, and others.
? Some of the leading companies offering texturized vegetable protein are Archer Daniels Midland Company, CHS Inc., Roquette Frères, Beneo GmbH, Danisco A/S, Vestkron A/S, Cargill Inc., FUJI OIL CO., LTD., Puris Proteins, LLC., MGP Ingredients, Inc., Crown Soya Protein Group, Sotexpro SA, Wilmar International Ltd., Gushen Biotechnology Group Co., Ltd.,Ingredion Inc.
1. Executive Summary 1.1. Global Market Outlook 1.2. Summary of Statistics 1.3. Summary of Key Findings 1.4. Analysis and Recommendations 2. Market Overview 2.1. Market Coverage / Taxonomy 2.2. Market Definition / Scope / Limitations 3. Product Innovation and Development 3.1. Cultural Customization to Target Specific Populations and Ethnic Groups 3.2. Creating New Delivery Mechanisms 3.3. Shift towards Natural Ingredients 3.4. Brand Differentiation through Packaging 4. Risk & Opportunity 4.1. Risk Analysis 4.2. Opportunity Analysis 5. Market Dynamics 5.1. Drivers 5.2. Restraints 5.3. Opportunity 5.4. Trends 5.5. Macro-Economic Factors 5.6. Forecast Factors - Relevance & Impact 6. Value Chain Analysis 6.1. Supply Chain Analysis 6.1.1. Raw Material Suppliers 6.1.2. Product Manufacturers 6.1.3. Distributors/Suppliers/Wholesalers 7. Policy and Regulatory Landscape 7.1. Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) 7.2. Federal Food & Cosmetics Act 7.3. Europe Food & Safety Authority 7.4. State Food and Drug Administration (SFDA) 7.5. Foods for Specified Health Uses 7.6. FSSAI 7.7. Food Packaging Claims 7.8. Labeling and Claims 7.9. Import/Export Regulations 8. Global Market Demand Analysis 2016-2020 and Forecast, 2021-2031 8.1. Historical Market Volume (Metric Tons) Analysis, 2016-2020 8.2. Current and Future Market Volume (Metric Tons) Projections, 2021-2031 8.3. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis 9. Global Market - Pricing Analysis 9.1. Regional Pricing Analysis (US$/Metric Tons) By Product Type 9.2. Global Average Pricing Analysis Benchmark 9.3. Pricing Influencing Factors 10. Global Market Analysis 2016-2020 and Forecast 2021-2031, By Product Type 10.1. Introduction / Key Findings 10.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Analysis By Product Type , 2016 - 2020 10.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By Product Type, 2021 - 2031 10.3.1. Soy 10.3.2. Wheat 10.3.3. Pea 10.3.4. Rice 10.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Product Type 11. Global Market Analysis 2016-2020 and Forecast 2021-2031, By Nature 11.1. Introduction / Key Findings 11.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Analysis By Nature, 2016 - 2020 11.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By Nature, 2021 - 2031 11.3.1. Organic 11.3.2. Conventional 11.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Nature 12. Global Market Analysis 2016-2020 and Forecast 2021-2031, By Form 12.1. Introduction / Key Findings 12.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Analysis By Form, 2016 - 2020 12.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By Form, 2021 - 2031 12.3.1. Chunks 12.3.2. Slice 12.3.3. Flakes 12.3.4. Granules 12.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Form 13. Global Market Analysis 2016-2020 and Forecast 2021-2031, By End Users 13.1. Introduction / Key Findings 13.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Analysis By End Users, 2016 - 2020 13.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By End Users, 2021 - 2031 13.3.1. Households 13.3.2. Commercial 13.3.3. Industry 13.3.3.1. Food Industry 13.3.3.1.1. Bakery 13.3.3.1.2. Snacks 13.3.3.1.3. Ready Meals 13.3.3.1.4. Sports Nutrition 13.3.3.1.5. Clinical Nutrition 13.3.3.1.6. Baby Food 13.3.3.1.7. Meat Analogues 13.3.3.1.8. Others 13.3.3.2. Animal Feed & Pet Food 13.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By End Users 14. Global Market Analysis 2016-2020 and Forecast 2021-2031, By Distribution Channel 14.1. Introduction / Key Findings 14.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Analysis By Distribution Channel, 2016-2020 14.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By Distribution Channel, 2021 – 2031 14.3.1. Direct 14.3.2. Indirect 14.3.2.1. Store Based 14.3.2.2. Hypermarket 14.3.2.3. Convenience Store 14.3.2.4. Traditional Grocery Retail 14.3.2.5. Online Retail 14.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Distribution Channel 15. Global Market Analysis 2016-2020 and Forecast 2021-2031, By Region 15.1. Introduction 15.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Analysis By Region, 2016 - 2020 15.3. Current Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Analysis and Forecast By Region, 2021 - 2031 15.3.1. North America 15.3.2. Latin America 15.3.3. Europe 15.3.4. East Asia 15.3.5. South Asia 15.3.6. Oceania 15.3.7. Middle East and Africa (MEA) 15.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Region 16. North America Market Analysis 2016-2020 and Forecast 2021-2031 16.1. Introduction 16.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2016 - 2020 16.3. Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2021 - 2031 16.3.1. By Country 16.3.1.1. U.S. 16.3.1.2. Canada 16.3.2. By Product Type 16.3.3. By Nature 16.3.4. By Form 16.3.5. By End Users 16.3.6. By Distribution Channel 16.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis 16.4.1. By Country 16.4.2. By Product Type 16.4.3. By Nature 16.4.4. By Form 16.4.5. By End Users 16.4.6. By Distribution Channel 16.5. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis 17. Latin America Market Analysis 2016-2020 and Forecast 2021-2031 17.1. Introduction 17.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2016 - 2020 17.3. Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2021 - 2031 17.3.1. By Country 17.3.1.1. Brazil 17.3.1.2. Mexico 17.3.1.3. Argentina 17.3.1.4. Rest of Latin America 17.3.2. By Product Type 17.3.3. By Nature 17.3.4. By Form 17.3.5. By End Users 17.3.6. By Distribution Channel 17.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis 17.4.1. By Country 17.4.2. By Product Type 17.4.3. By Nature 17.4.4. By Form 17.4.5. By End Users 17.4.6. By Distribution Channel 17.5. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis 18. Europe Market Analysis 2016-2020 and Forecast 2021-2031 18.1. Introduction 18.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2016 - 2020 18.3. Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2021 - 2031 18.3.1. By Country 18.3.1.1. Germany 18.3.1.2. Italy 18.3.1.3. France 18.3.1.4. U.K. 18.3.1.5. Spain 18.3.1.6. Benelux 18.3.1.7. Russia 18.3.1.8. Poland 18.3.1.9. Rest of Europe 18.3.2. By Product Type 18.3.3. By Nature 18.3.4. By Form 18.3.5. By End Users 18.3.6. By Distribution Channel 18.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis 18.4.1. By Country 18.4.2. By Product Type 18.4.3. By Nature 18.4.4. By Form 18.4.5. By End Users 18.4.6. By Distribution Channel 18.5. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis 19. East Asia Market Analysis 2016-2020 and Forecast 2021-2031 19.1. Introduction 19.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2016 - 2020 19.3. Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2021 - 2031 19.3.1. By Country 19.3.1.1. China 19.3.1.2. Japan 19.3.1.3. South Korea 19.3.2. By Product Type 19.3.3. By Nature 19.3.4. By Form 19.3.5. By End Users 19.3.6. By Distribution Channel 19.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis 19.4.1. By Country 19.4.2. By Product Type 19.4.3. By Nature 19.4.4. By Form 19.4.5. By End Users 19.4.6. By Distribution Channel 19.5. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis 20. South Asia Market Analysis 2016-2020 and Forecast 2021-2031 20.1. Introduction 20.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2016 - 2020 20.3. Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2021 - 2031 20.3.1. By Country 20.3.1.1. India 20.3.1.2. Thailand 20.3.1.3. Indonesia 20.3.1.4. Malaysia 20.3.1.5. Singapore 20.3.1.6. Rest of South Asia 20.3.2. By Product Type 20.3.3. By Nature 20.3.4. By Form 20.3.5. By End Users 20.3.6. By Distribution Channel 20.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis 20.4.1. By Country 20.4.2. By Product Type 20.4.3. By Nature 20.4.4. By Form 20.4.5. By End Users 20.4.6. By Distribution Channel 20.5. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis 21. Oceania Market Analysis 2016-2020 and Forecast 2021-2031 21.1. Introduction 21.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2016 - 2020 21.3. Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2021 - 2031 21.3.1. By Country 21.3.1.1. Australia 21.3.1.2. New Zealand 21.3.2. By Product Type 21.3.3. By Nature 21.3.4. By Form 21.3.5. By End Users 21.3.6. By Distribution Channel 21.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis 21.4.1. By Country 21.4.2. By Product Type 21.4.3. By Nature 21.4.4. By Form 21.4.5. By End Users 21.4.6. By Distribution Channel 21.5. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis 22. Middle East and Africa Market Analysis 2016-2020 and Forecast 2021-2031 22.1. Introduction 22.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2016 - 2020 22.3. Market Size (US$ Mn) and Volume Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2021 - 2031 22.3.1. By Country 22.3.1.1. GCC Countries 22.3.1.2. Turkey 22.3.1.3. South Africa 22.3.1.4. Northern Africa 22.3.1.5. Rest of MEA 22.3.2. By Product Type 22.3.3. By Nature 22.3.4. By Form 22.3.5. By End Users 22.3.6. By Distribution Channel 22.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis 22.4.1. By Country 22.4.2. By Product Type 22.4.3. By Form 22.4.4. By End Users 22.4.5. By Distribution Channel 22.5. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis 23. Emerging Countries Market Analysis 2016-2020 and Forecast 2021-2031 23.1. Introduction 23.2. China Market Analysis 2016-2020 and Forecast 2021-2031 23.2.1. By Product Type 23.2.2. By Nature 23.2.3. By Form 23.2.4. By End Users 23.2.5. By Distribution Channel 23.2.6. Market Attractiveness Analysis 23.2.7. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis 23.3. France Market Analysis 2016-2020 and Forecast 2021-2031 23.3.1. By Product Type 23.3.2. By Nature 23.3.3. By Form 23.3.4. By End Users 23.3.5. By Distribution Channel 23.3.6. Market Attractiveness Analysis 23.3.7. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis 23.4. U.K Market Analysis 2016-2020 and Forecast 2021-2031 23.4.1. By Product Type 23.4.2. By Nature 23.4.3. By Form 23.4.4. By End Users 23.4.5. By Distribution Channel 23.4.6. Market Attractiveness Analysis 23.4.7. Drivers and Restraints - Impact Analysis 24. Market Structure Analysis 24.1. Global Market Competition - a Dashboard View 24.2. Global Market Structure Analysis 24.3. Global Market Company Share Analysis 24.3.1. Company Market Share Analysis of Top 10 Players, By Region 24.3.2. Company Market Share Analysis of Top 10 Players, By Product Type 24.4. Key Participants Market Presence (Intensity Mapping) by Region 25. Competition Analysis 25.1. Competition Dashboard 25.2. Competition Benchmarking 25.3. Competition Deep Dive 25.3.1. ROQUETTE FRERES S.A 25.3.1.1. Overview 25.3.1.2. Product Portfolio 25.3.1.3. Key Developments/Key Takeaways 25.3.1.4. Strategy Overview 25.3.1.5. Financial Overview 25.3.2. CHS Inc. 25.3.2.1. Overview 25.3.2.2. Product Portfolio 25.3.2.3. Key Developments/Key Takeaways 25.3.2.4. Strategy Overview 25.3.2.5. Financial Overview 25.3.3. Archer Daniels Midland Company 25.3.3.1. Overview 25.3.3.2. Product Portfolio 25.3.3.3. Key Developments/Key Takeaways 25.3.3.4. Strategy Overview 25.3.3.5. Financial Overview 25.3.4. Cargill Inc. 25.3.4.1. Overview 25.3.4.2. Product Portfolio 25.3.4.3. Key Developments/Key Takeaways 25.3.4.4. Strategy Overview 25.3.4.5. Financial Overview 25.3.5. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. 25.3.5.1. Overview 25.3.5.2. Product Portfolio 25.3.5.3. Key Developments/Key Takeaways 25.3.5.4. Strategy Overview 25.3.5.5. Financial Overview 25.3.6. MGP Ingredients, Inc. 25.3.6.1. Overview 25.3.6.2. Product Portfolio 25.3.6.3. Key Developments/Key Takeaways 25.3.6.4. Strategy Overview 25.3.6.5. Financial Overview 25.3.7. Sonic Biochem Extractions Limited 25.3.7.1. Overview 25.3.7.2. Product Portfolio 25.3.7.3. Key Developments/Key Takeaways 25.3.7.4. Strategy Overview 25.3.7.5. Financial Overview 25.3.8. Sotexpro 25.3.8.1. Overview 25.3.8.2. Product Portfolio 25.3.8.3. Key Developments/Key Takeaways 25.3.8.4. Strategy Overview 25.3.8.5. Financial Overview 25.3.9. BENEO GmbH 25.3.9.1. Overview 25.3.9.2. Product Portfolio 25.3.9.3. Key Developments/Key Takeaways 25.3.9.4. Strategy Overview 25.3.9.5. Financial Overview 25.3.10. Victoria Group 25.3.10.1. Overview 25.3.10.2. Product Portfolio 25.3.10.3. Key Developments/Key Takeaways 25.3.10.4. Strategy Overview 25.3.10.5. Financial Overview 25.3.11. Shandong Yuxin Soybean Protein Co. Ltd. 25.3.11.1. Overview 25.3.11.2. Product Portfolio 25.3.11.3. Key Developments/Key Takeaways 25.3.11.4. Strategy Overview 25.3.11.5. Financial Overview 25.3.12. Crown Soya Protein Group 25.3.12.1. Overview 25.3.12.2. Product Portfolio 25.3.12.3. Key Developments/Key Takeaways 25.3.12.4. Strategy Overview 25.3.12.5. Financial Overview 26. Assumptions and Acronyms Used 27. Research Methodology
Explore Food and Beverage Insights
View Reports
Texturized Vegetable Protein Market
