Mineral Licks Market

How big is the Mineral Licks Market in 2026?

USD 1,120.0 million in 2026 and USD 1,789.9 million by 2036 at a 4.8% CAGR.

The mineral licks market was valued at USD 1,068.7 million in 2025. It is expected to advance from USD 1,120.0 million in 2026 to USD 1,789.9 million by 2036 at 4.8% CAGR. Livestock mineral supplementation is shifting into a documented production-control purchase for grazing and housed animal systems. FAO reported in July 2025 that total cattle and sheep inventories are projected to expand alongside pig and poultry inventories by 7% by 2034. The herd expansion is expected to increase demand for mineral licks that help producers manage sodium access and seasonal forage variation inside animal feed planning. Producers treat mineral access as a routine production-control check rather than a small farm-store purchase.

Feed mills, cooperatives and livestock producers are expected to treat mineral licks as service-backed inputs rather than low-value farm supplies. IFIF stated in its September 2025 annual report that members represent over 80% of total compound animal feed production worldwide. Nutrition teams are expected to compare documentation, palatability and farm handling fit before moving products into feed premix programs for ruminant and poultry accounts. Account managers then review service reliability before cooperatives approve recurring stock commitments across local dealer networks.

The purchase chain gains value from formulation to pasture use due to the need for reliable intake and stable field handling. FAO opened its October 2025 animal feed forum with a focus on safe feed systems and livestock transformation. Ranchers in established markets are expected to weight salt purity and trace-mineral claims during supplier screening. Livestock producers in higher-growth markets are likely to weight dealer access and farm advisory support. Sourcing teams are expected to use compound feed demand links to screen partners that reduce mineral gaps without adding avoidable handling work.

Summary of the Mineral Licks Market

Market Signal	Commercial Impact
Demand and Growth Drivers	Mineral licks spending is expected to be driven by forage variability and feed-cost accountability. Documentation urgency is projected to come from trace-mineral claims and farm audit needs. Livestock producers are expected to widen free-choice mineral use driven by pasture gaps that reduce intake consistency during seasonal grazing programs. Feed mills are projected to screen dry blocks attributable to blending familiarity and dealer requests for fewer dosing errors at farm level. Cooperatives are anticipated to request clearer specification packs supported by IFIF feed-safety priorities and producer demand for traceable inputs. Farm veterinarians are likely to influence product trials owing to animal-health review needs during calving and flock expansion cycles.
Product and Segment View	Dry, mineral and poultry lead their respective categories in 2026. Nutrient utilization is estimated to define the main functional screen for farm accounts. By form, dry is projected to account for 40.0% of demand in 2026 due to storage tolerance and block-handling familiarity. The mineral source is estimated to hold 33.0% share in 2026 owing to sodium and trace-element claim clarity. Poultry is forecast to represent 35.5% of livestock demand in 2026 driven by mineral supplementation in high-throughput feed routines. Nutrient utilization is likely to capture 33.0% of function demand in 2026 supported by ration-balancing discipline.
Geography and Growth Outlook	India and China form the higher-growth tier. Established markets are expected to rely more on documentation discipline and farm-service availability. India is projected to grow at 4.3% CAGR through 2036 driven by dairy and poultry expansion across organized farm channels. China is forecast to post 3.6% CAGR over the forecast period supported by large meat-output systems and feed efficiency scrutiny. The United States is anticipated to record 2.9% CAGR by 2036 shaped by cattle-herd monitoring and ranch mineral programs. Germany, the United Kingdom and Japan are estimated to advance at measured rates during the assessment period due to tighter herds and stricter documentation.
Competitive Landscape	Competition is moderately concentrated among animal nutrition groups and salt-mineral specialists. Sourcing evaluation centers on block performance, mineral files and dealer service. Cargill and Compass Minerals compete on salt-block availability reinforced by branded agricultural salt and free-choice mineral formats for ranch accounts. ADM and Trouw Nutrition support nutrition-led accounts led by mineral optimization and ruminant feeding guidance for feed mills. Alltech Lienert and Ridley Corporation serve grazing producers shaped by loose-lick formats and regional advisory access in pasture systems. K+S Minerals and Agriculture is expected to draw attention from accounts that require salt purity and trace-mineral block options for distributor catalogs.
Analyst Perspective	Adoption is expected to depend less on product availability and more on whether suppliers can reduce uncertainty around intake, placement and species fit. Account retention will likely be strongest where mineral documentation is paired with practical field support. The primary purchase screen is expected to move from basic mineral access toward proof that each format can be used consistently across farm conditions and species routines. Mineral-lick suppliers that provide troubleshooting support are likely to keep accounts after first-season product trials. Competitive position is projected to differ by dealer reach and trace-mineral evidence over the forecast period. - Nandini Roy Choudhury, Principal Analyst at Future Market Insights

How is the mineral licks market segmented?

The mineral licks market is segmented by form, source, livestock, function, and region.

The mineral licks market is segmented by form, source, livestock, function, and region for forecasting and comparison. By form, it covers dry, liquid, pellet, premix, and encapsulated formats used in farm and feed-channel planning. By source, it covers synthetic, microbial, plant/botanical, mineral, and yeast-based inputs that define ingredient identity. By livestock, it covers poultry, swine, ruminants, aquaculture, and equine and pets across species programs. By function, it covers gut health, growth performance, immunity, nutrient utilization, and stress management. Regional coverage includes North America, Europe, East Asia, South Asia, and Latin America, linked to related demand in animal feed additives.

How does dry shape demand within the form category?

Storage and pasture placement make form choice a farm-level service decision before broader adoption starts for mixed herds. IFIF reported in June 2026 that world compound feed production exceeds 1 billion tonnes annually, which makes handling consistency visible across feed and supplement programs. Dry mineral licks are evaluated for block strength, storage behavior and placement convenience before cooperatives expand seasonal stocking.

• By form, dry is projected to account for 40.0% of demand in 2026 due to lower storage burden and simpler dealer handling. Cargill agricultural salt information identifies compressed salt blocks for free-choice feeding, which gives ruminant programs a familiar dry-format screen before ranches approve seasonal replacement orders across remote grazing routes.
• Dry formats are witnessing demand from cooperatives owing to lower spill risk during transport and easier placement in grazing areas. Producers comparing cattle feed programs value blocks that avoid extra dosing labor during peak grazing months. Ridley Corporation product materials support this format logic for pasture systems that need steady access during seasonal rainfall and heat.

What supports demand for mineral source choices?

Trace-element credibility shapes source selection before nutrition teams approve label and species use in commercial accounts. Kemin reported in March 2025 that its innovation work includes feed additives designed to improve feed intake efficiency, which keeps mineral form and biological use inside the same review. Mineral-source products are evaluated for sodium content, trace-element balance and claim support before farm accounts expand orders.

• The mineral source is estimated to hold 33.0% of demand in 2026 owing to the need for clear sodium and trace-element identity. K+S SOLSEL product information describes mineral lick blocks for cattle and horses in grazing systems. The same product family also covers goats and sheep, which supports source-specific positioning across mixed-species farms.
• Demand for mineral-source licks is expected to grow among livestock producers attributable to straightforward nutrient labeling and low training needs. Dealer teams handling feed ingredient sourcing prefer products that explain mineral identity without heavy formulation language. Cargill agricultural salt information reinforces that basic salt and mineral formats still need clear use directions for farm accounts.

How do nutrition teams evaluate poultry within the livestock category?

Poultry accounts create a different mineral-use case due to high flock throughput and standardized feed routines. OECD-FAO reported in July 2025 that global poultry consumption is projected to reach 173 Mt by 2034. The outlook keeps mineral balance close to feed-conversion planning across high-throughput broiler and layer farms. Poultry-focused mineral supplements are assessed more like dry premix inputs than pasture blocks in integrator buying. Integrator teams therefore expect product files that connect mineral inputs to documented flock routines and feed-mill checks.

• By livestock, poultry is forecast to represent 35.5% of demand in 2026 driven by high-volume feed routines and mineral-balancing needs. Codex animal-feed guidance links feed quality to animal health and food safety in food-producing animals. The guidance keeps mineral claims close to flock records and feed-mill documentation before integrators expand commercial product approval.
• Poultry operations are increasingly purchasing mineral lick and supplement formats led by feed-conversion control and routine flock-health checks. Nutrition teams use poultry feed planning references to compare mineral inputs against ingredient risk and routine feed audits. The category is expected to favor suppliers that explain species instructions without adding extra mill work.

How is nutrient utilization positioned within function decisions?

Function screening is centered on whether a mineral lick helps the animal use feed more predictably. FAO feed-safety materials note that around 300 million tonnes of feed are produced directly by on-farm mixing, which leaves more variation outside formal mill audits. Nutrient utilization claims therefore need clear intake guidance, mineral composition data and practical field instructions for producers. Farm advisers then look for field notes that explain intake variation across different herd types.

• Nutrient utilization is likely to capture 33.0% of function demand in 2026 attributable to ration-balancing needs during grazing and housed feeding. Alltech mineral-management materials emphasize trace minerals for biological functions in ruminant and poultry systems, which supports function-level screening. Farm teams then review whether the lick supports visible condition management rather than only a broad mineral claim.
• Purchase activity for nutrient utilization is anticipated to rise driven by pressure to link mineral access to feed use and animal condition. Farm advisers following feed probiotic programs are expected to prefer mineral licks that support measurable ration outcomes. The functional screen therefore centers on intake consistency and field guidance for each farm account.

What makes North America central to regional planning?

Regional planning depends on herd visibility and service infrastructure across ranching and feed retail channels. USDA NASS reported in January 2026 that about 35,000 operators were surveyed for the cattle report. The survey depth shows why United States cattle management remains visible for feed suppliers. North American accounts therefore place weight on mineral files and dealer stocking discipline before annual stocking decisions. Ranch distributors also expect product files that align with seasonal stocking calendars and field-service routes.

• North America is set to lead regional demand with 31.5% share in 2026 due to established ranch distribution and feed retail networks. Compass Minerals offers free-choice and feed-mixing animal nutrition salt options, which supports regional format breadth. Regional accounts also evaluate whether suppliers are able to keep block availability steady during pasture and winter-feeding cycles.
• Livestock producers are expected to favor North American mineral licks over alternatives due to dealer availability and documented salt-block options. Regional distributors use customized premix planning benchmarks to compare stock discipline and service support. Products that combine free-choice use directions and dependable delivery are expected to earn repeat stocking during seasonal programs.

What are the drivers, restraints, and opportunities in the Mineral Licks Market?

Near-term purchases are being shaped by forage mineral gaps, intake-control limits, and dealer-backed replenishment routes outlined below.

• Driver: Seasonal forage variability is expected to push producers toward mineral licks that support predictable sodium and trace-element access.
• Restraint: Intake variability is likely to slow adoption in herds that lack placement guidance and species-specific feeding instructions.
• Opportunity: Dealer-backed mineral programs are projected to open access for grazing farms that need low-labor supplementation.

Grazing producers are expected to increase mineral-lick purchases where forage mineral gaps affect intake and body condition across seasonal pasture programs. FAO reported in October 2025 that its animal feed forum placed safe feed systems and feed regulators inside livestock transformation discussions. Mineral-lick suppliers that translate feed-safety language into placement guidance are likely to secure trials before larger seasonal orders from cooperatives and ranch retailers. 

Ration managers are likely to delay adoption if free-choice intake changes sharply between species and weather conditions during herd movement. Codex Alimentarius animal-feed guidance states that good animal feeding establishes a safety system for food-producing animals. The guidance keeps claims review and use instructions close to mineral lick approval during supplier qualification. Farm accounts therefore need clear placement rules before they shift routine mineral purchases away from familiar block programs. The barrier is  practical ownership across use directions and monitoring routines for each livestock account.

Dealer networks are projected to convert restraint into access by bundling mineral licks with pasture checks and replenishment advice. Alltech Lienert guidance identifies loose mineral licks as weather-resistant supplements for year-round pasture use. The service model is expected to support adoption among producers that compare mineral licks against pet food premix documentation routines. Suppliers that simplify field use are expected to reduce handoff risk between nutrition advice and farm placement.

Which country CAGRs are profiled in the Mineral Licks Market?

Country	CAGR
United States	2.9%
China	3.6%
India	4.3%
Germany	2.4%
United Kingdom	2.6%
Japan	2.1%
South Korea	2.8%

Source: FMI's proprietary forecasting model and primary research

How do country-level CAGRs compare in the Mineral Licks Market?

India is projected to expand at 4.3% CAGR through 2036 and China is forecast to grow at 3.6% CAGR over the forecast period. The United States is anticipated to post 2.9% CAGR by 2036 and South Korea is estimated to advance at 2.8% CAGR during the assessment period. The United Kingdom is predicted to record 2.6% CAGR and Germany is likely to grow at 2.4% CAGR. Japan is forecast to rise at 2.1% CAGR due to tight livestock economics and careful feed-documentation cycles. The variation reflects dairy scale and meat-output density that raise mineral access needs in higher-growth markets. 

• By 2036, the United States is projected to grow at 2.9% CAGR due to ranch mineral programs and documented cattle-herd monitoring. USDA NASS reported in January 2026 that 86.2 million cattle and calves were on United States farms. The herd base keeps salt blocks and trace-mineral products tied to grazing management and replacement-heifer planning across extensive ranch systems. Feed retailers face constraints from herd contraction and price sensitivity in drought-prone states that limit speculative stocking. Mineral-lick adoption is expected to remain tied to products that explain placement timing and intake control. Cargill and Compass Minerals are expected to receive greater consideration in accounts that require branded agricultural salt and dependable dealer replenishment.
• China's mineral licks outlook is anticipated to advance at 3.6% CAGR over the assessment period, supported by meat-output scale and feed-efficiency scrutiny. National Bureau of Statistics of China reported in February 2026 that combined meat output reached 100.72 million tonnes in 2025. The official basket covered pork and poultry together with beef and mutton inside one national output indicator. The output base raises the value of mineral supplements that help stabilize trace-element programs across dense livestock systems. Local adoption faces documentation pressure from larger integrators and provincial feed channels that standardize ration inputs. Feed companies are expected to favor products that connect mineral composition to species routines. Suppliers with mineral identity files are expected to receive greater consideration in accounts that require standardized ration support.
• Mineral licks demand in India is forecast to rise at 4.3% CAGR over the forecast period, propelled by dairy expansion and rural dealer penetration. The Press Information Bureau reported in November 2025 that milk production reached 247.87 million tonnes during 2024-25. The dairy scale raises demand for low-labor mineral access across smallholder and cooperative milk systems. Adoption is constrained by uneven advisory support and seasonal cash flow among farms during rural sourcing cycles. Village-level distribution is expected to reward suppliers that simplify pack sizes and usage directions. Cooperatives are expected to concentrate purchases among suppliers that provide affordable blocks and clear cattle-use instructions before peak milk seasons.
• The  mineral licks industry in Germany is estimated to expand at 2.4% CAGR through 2036, shaped by controlled herd systems and precise mineral documentation. Destatis listed Germany's cattle count at 10.35 million in May 2026 across cattle holdings. The herd profile keeps mineral licks within dairy and beef programs that already use structured ration reviews. Product uptake is limited by strict sourcing screens and lower herd expansion across commercial cattle farms. German accounts are expected to require proof that block composition matches certified feeding plans and farm audit files. Suppliers with documented trace-mineral composition are expected to receive greater consideration in accounts that require feed-safety and organic-farm compatibility.
• The United Kingdom mineral licks sector is projected to record 2.6% CAGR during the assessment period, reinforced by poultry growth and mixed grazing needs. GOV.UK reported in December 2025 that the total number of poultry reached 183 million birds in June 2025. The poultry base supports mineral supplement planning in feed programs and farm retail channels. Cattle and sheep contraction limits volume upside for pasture blocks in several grazing regions. Mixed farms are expected to value mineral products that serve poultry-linked feed routines and grazing support. Farm retail programs are expected to draw attention from producers in regions that need simple mineral access and dealer-led replacement advice.
• In Japan, mineral lick and supplement demand is predicted to advance at 2.1% CAGR through 2036 due to tight livestock economics and careful ration planning. USDA FAS/Tokyo cited in January 2026 that MAFF data showed average cattle carcass weight at 456 kilograms in the first half of 2025. Stable carcass weights keep mineral supplementation tied to productivity preservation rather than herd expansion. Adoption is limited by aging farm structures and cautious spending across smaller cattle operations. Farm advisers are expected to prefer low-labor blocks that reduce monitoring work for those operations. Suppliers with clear feeding instructions are expected to receive greater consideration in accounts that require lower-labor mineral placement.
• South Korea is estimated to post 2.8% CAGR over the forecast period, strengthened by poultry flock density and organized feed systems. The Ministry of Data and Statistics recorded in November 2025 that broilers reached 94.253 million in the third quarter of 2025. Broiler scale raises demand for mineral supplementation that fits feed schedules and farm-health monitoring. Adoption pressure comes from falling beef and dairy cattle numbers in the same official release. Contract feed accounts are expected to favor mineral formats that fit scheduled farm visits and poultry-house routines. Regional distributors are expected to concentrate purchases among suppliers that align mineral products with poultry feed routines and service visits.

Who are the notable companies in the Mineral Licks Market?

Cargill, ADM, Alltech Lienert, Trouw Nutrition, Compass Minerals, K+S Minerals and Agriculture, Ridley Corporation, and Concord Overseas are the notable companies shaping this market.

The competitive base is moderately concentrated around animal nutrition groups and salt-mineral specialists that already serve feed retail channels. Scale is controlled by salt sourcing, trace-mineral formulation and distribution access in ranching regions. Established multinational suppliers hold wider account access due to feed portfolios and documentation teams. Smaller regional specialists compete on loose-lick formats, pasture advice and local replenishment routes for grazing accounts. Competition centers on block durability and mineral documentation rather than broad additive breadth during supplier reviews. Dealer continuity makes algae-based animal inputs a practical comparison point for farm accounts that evaluate service support and ingredient evidence.

Salt-block availability defines a sourcing lane for ranch accounts that need repeatable free-choice mineral access. Cargill and Compass Minerals serve programs that need agricultural salt, mineralized blocks and replenishment certainty. Their practical advantage comes from recognizable farm brands and dealer access during grazing seasons that require repeated placement checks.

Nutrition-service capability creates a separate lane for formulated accounts that place mineral licks beside ration programs. ADM and Trouw Nutrition support feed mills and ruminant producers that need mineral guidance inside wider feeding plans. These companies compete on advisory depth and species knowledge across accounts that connect blocks to premix and complete-feed decisions.

Regional grazing support gives Alltech Lienert and Ridley Corporation a position built around pasture-based use. Both companies address loose-lick and mineral supplement needs in cattle and sheep systems across pasture accounts. Their account access is shaped by field education and product fit for producers that need simpler guidance on placement and seasonal replacement cycles.

Salt purity and block format breadth give K+S Minerals and Agriculture and Concord Overseas a narrower route. They fit accounts that prioritize lick-block form and mineral traceability over full ration service. The salt-focused group is expected to compete effectively in distributor accounts that need simple catalog positioning and export-ready salt products.

Competitive Benchmarking: Mineral Licks Market

Company	Block or lick relevance	Mineral documentation	Dealer reach	Species fit
Cargill	High	High	Global	Strong
ADM	Medium	High	Global	Strong
Alltech Lienert	Strong	Medium	Regional	Strong
Trouw Nutrition	Medium	High	Global	Strong
Compass Minerals	High	Medium	Global	Medium
K+S Minerals and Agriculture	High	Medium	Global	Medium
Ridley Corporation	Strong	Medium	Regional	Strong
Concord Overseas	High	Medium	Regional	Medium

Source: Future Market Insights competitive analysis, 2026. Ratings reflect relative portfolio relevance and workflow fit. Service capability and geographic reach shape the remaining comparison.

Key Developments in the Mineral Licks Market

• In February 2026, Alltech launched Akralos Animal Nutrition in North America to combine regional feed operations under one platform. The new company combines Alltech's Hubbard Feeds and Masterfeeds businesses with ADM's United States feed operations.
• In September 2025, ADM unveiled Digest Carb for dairy performance at SPACE 2025 in western France. The feed solution was introduced to support natural microbial processes and feed efficiency in dairy herds.
• In February 2025, Alltech reported that its validated chelation assay supports trace-mineral regulatory requirements for organic mineral products. The assay verifies whether organic trace minerals meet defined chelation expectations for feed use.
• In September 2025, ADM and Alltech announced plans for a North American animal feed joint venture. The agreement was designed to combine feed manufacturing reach and animal nutrition expertise under one North American platform.

Key Players in the Mineral Licks Market

Integrated animal nutrition suppliers

• Cargill
• ADM
• Trouw Nutrition

Mineral and salt-block specialists

• Compass Minerals
• K+S Minerals and Agriculture
• Concord Overseas

Regional grazing and loose-lick suppliers

• Alltech Lienert
• Ridley Corporation

Mineral Licks Market - Report Scope

Coverage field	Report scope
Market breakdown	Mineral Licks Market Breakdown By Form, Source, Livestock, Function, and Region
Market Definition	Mineral licks are dry, liquid or formulated free-choice mineral supplements used by livestock producers and feed channels to provide salt and trace elements outside standard rations.
Regions Covered	North America, Latin America, Europe, East Asia, South Asia and Pacific, Middle East and Africa
Countries Covered	United States, China, India, Germany, United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea and 30+ countries
Key Companies Profiled	Cargill, ADM, Alltech Lienert, Trouw Nutrition, Compass Minerals, K+S Minerals and Agriculture, Ridley Corporation, Concord Overseas
Forecast Period	2026 to 2036
Approach	Hybrid bottom-up and top-down methodology using segment adoption rates, livestock-use cases, country-level herd indicators, supplier portfolio depth and dealer-channel coverage

Source: Future Market Insights - analysis driven by proprietary forecasting models and primary research

Mineral Licks Market - Research Methodology

Method	Approach
Primary Research	FMI analysts gathered input from manufacturers, service providers, technology developers, distributors, end users, buying teams, and subject-matter experts. Interviews examined purchasing decisions, product or service evaluation, adoption barriers, approval requirements, pricing considerations, and expectations for technical or commercial support. Respondents were also asked what evidence is required before a trial, pilot, or initial order develops into regular purchasing.
Desk Research	Desk research covered government statistics, regulatory publications, trade data, industry associations, technical literature, standards, company filings, product information, and official corporate announcements. Sources were reviewed for relevance, publication date, geographic coverage, and consistency with the defined market scope. Claims relating to performance, applications, approvals, capacity, investment, and commercial activity were retained only when supported by credible public evidence.
Market Sizing and Forecasting	The market model combined the baseline value with historical performance, segment structure, pricing and volume indicators, adoption levels, company participation, and country-level demand conditions. Forecast assumptions considered economic activity, investment trends, regulatory developments, technology adoption, purchasing cycles, supply availability, and barriers to wider market use. Segment and regional estimates were reconciled before the final market total was calculated.
Data Validation	Estimates were checked against multiple independent indicators, including public data, company activity, trade patterns, industry developments, and findings from primary interviews. Validation also tested whether products, services, applications, and company revenues fell within the defined market boundaries. Adjacent categories, unsupported claims, overlapping revenues, and activities without direct market relevance were excluded to reduce double counting and maintain consistency across segments and countries.

Mineral Licks Market by Segments

Mineral Licks Market segmented by Form:

• Dry
• Liquid
• Pellet
• Premix
• Encapsulated

Mineral Licks Market segmented by Source:

• Synthetic
• Microbial
• Plant/Botanical
• Mineral
• Yeast-based

Mineral Licks Market segmented by Livestock:

• Poultry
• Swine
• Ruminants
• Aquaculture
• Equine & pets

Mineral Licks Market segmented by Function:

• Gut health
• Growth performance
• Immunity
• Nutrient utilization
• Stress management

Mineral Licks Market segmented by Region:

• North America
• Europe
• East Asia
• South Asia
• Latin America

Mineral Licks Market by Region:

• North America
  • United States
  • Canada
• Latin America
  • Brazil
  • Mexico
  • Chile
  • Rest of Latin America
• Western Europe
  • Germany
  • United Kingdom
  • Italy
  • Spain
  • France
  • Nordic
  • BENELUX
  • Rest of Western Europe
• Eastern Europe
  • Poland
  • Hungary
  • Balkan and Baltic
  • Rest of Eastern Europe
• East Asia
  • China
  • Japan
  • South Korea
• South Asia and Pacific
  • India
  • ASEAN
  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Rest of South Asia and Pacific
• Middle East and Africa
  • Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
  • Other GCC Countries
  • Turkiye
  • South Africa
  • Other African Union
  • Rest of Middle East and Africa

Research Sources and Bibliography

• Codex Alimentarius Commission. (2026, June). Animal Feed. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization.
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2025, July). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2025-2034: Emerging economies will drive growth in animal-source food consumption and production. FAO.
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2025, October). Building safe, sustainable, and equitable animal feed systems. FAO.
• International Feed Industry Federation. (2025, September). IFIF launches its Annual Report 2024/2025. IFIF.
• International Feed Industry Federation. (2026, June). Global Feed Statistics. IFIF.
• National Agricultural Statistics Service. (2026, January). United States cattle inventory down slightly. USA Department of Agriculture.
• National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2026, February). Statistical Communiqué of the People's Republic of China on the 2025 National Economic and Social Development. National Bureau of Statistics of China.
• Press Information Bureau. (2025, November). Release of Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics 2025. Government of India.
• Federal Statistical Office. (2026, June). Holdings with cattle and stock of cattle. Destatis.
• Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs. (2025, December). Livestock populations in the United Kingdom at 1 June 2025. GOV.UK.
• Foreign Agricultural Service. (2026, January). Livestock and Products Annual. USA Department of Agriculture.
• Ministry of Data and Statistics. (2025, November). Livestock Statistics in the Third Quarter of 2025. Government of the Republic of Korea.
• Alltech. (2026, February). Akralos Debuts. Alltech.
• ADM. (2025, September). ADM Unveils New Feed Solution That Unlocks Nutrients for Optimized Dairy Performance. ADM.
• Alltech. (2025, February). Alltech's validated chelation assay continues to ensure trace minerals meet regulatory requirements. Alltech.
• Alltech. (2025, September). ADM, Alltech to bring together unparalleled expertise and experience in new North American animal feed joint venture. Alltech.
• Kemin Industries. (2025, March). Sustainability Spotlight - Featuring Veerle Van Hoeck. Kemin Industries.
• Cargill. (2026, June). Champion's Choice Agricultural Salt. Cargill Animal Nutrition.
• Compass Minerals. (2026, June). Animal Nutrition - Salt. Compass Minerals.
• K+S Minerals and Agriculture. (2026, June). Feed salt. K+S Aktiengesellschaft.
• Ridley Corporation. (2026, June). All Weather Mineral Supplement. Ridley Corporation.

This bibliography is provided for reader reference and uses primary government, standards-body, official trade body, and company sources.

This Report Answers

• What are the estimated 2026 and 2036 values for the mineral licks market?
• What CAGR is forecast for the mineral licks market from 2026 to 2036?
• Which form and source segments shape demand across livestock and function categories?
• Which forage, intake and documentation pressures support mineral lick purchase activity?
• How do country CAGRs differ across the seven profiled markets?
• Which companies compete across block relevance and dealer reach?
• What factors should livestock producers and feed-channel procurement teams address before broader sourcing commitments?
• How do trace-mineral documentation and feed-safety expectations affect vendor selection?