The global plant phenotyping market size is expected to be valued at US$ 175.9 million in 2023. Expansion of cloud computing and data analytics, bolsters the overall scope for plant phenotyping market, which is projected to grow at a CAGR of 11.0% between 2023 and 2033, totaling around US$ 497.4 million by 2033.
| Data Points | Key Statistics |
|---|---|
| Plant Phenotyping Market Value 2023 | US$ 175.9 million |
| Plant Phenotyping Market Projected Value (2033) | US$ 497.4 million |
| Plant Phenotyping Market CAGR (2023 to 2033) | 11.0% |
According to the analysis of Future Market Insights, the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) techniques in plant phenotyping has brought significant advancements in the analysis and interpretation of phenotypic data. AI and ML algorithms enable automated and rapid data processing, feature extraction, and predictive modeling, revolutionizing the field of plant phenotyping.
Plant phenotyping generates large volumes of data, including images, sensor readings, and other measurements. AI and ML algorithms can process this data automatically, reducing the manual effort and time required for analysis. The algorithms can handle high-throughput phenotyping, enabling the efficient analysis of large-scale datasets. Automated data processing accelerates the phenotyping pipeline, allowing researchers and breeders to extract valuable insights and make informed decisions more quickly.
AI and ML algorithms excel in extracting meaningful features from complex datasets. In plant phenotyping, these algorithms can identify and extract relevant features from images, sensor data, or spectral information. ML algorithms, for instance, can analyze plant images and extract characteristics such as leaf area, plant height, or biomass. The extracted features provide quantitative information for plant growth, architecture, and physiological traits. AI and ML algorithms enable accurate and consistent feature extraction, overcoming subjective biases and human errors.
AI and ML techniques enable the development of predictive models that relate phenotypic data to various plant attributes or environmental conditions. The models can uncover patterns and relationships that may not be easily discernible through traditional statistical analysis. ML models, by training on historical data, can predict future plant performance, growth trajectories, or response to specific treatments or stressors. Predictive modeling empowers researchers and farmers to make data-driven decisions and optimize crop management strategies.
Don't pay for what you don't need
Customize your report by selecting specific countries or regions and save 30%!
The global demand for plant phenotyping is projected to increase at a CAGR of 6.1% during the forecast period between 2018 and 2022, reaching a total of US$ 497.4 million in 2033.
According to Future Market Insights, a market research and competitive intelligence provider, the plant phenotyping market was valued at US$ 156.5 million in 2022.
The increasing research focus in plant sciences has led to significant investments in plant phenotyping research, which is expected to drive the growth of the plant phenotyping market. Plant phenotyping plays a vital role in crop improvement and breeding programs. Researchers are increasingly interested in developing crop varieties that possess desirable traits such as high yield, disease resistance, drought tolerance, and nutritional quality.
Plant phenotyping provides a comprehensive understanding of plant traits, growth patterns, and responses to environmental factors. Researchers, by analyzing phenotypic data can identify and select plants with desired traits, accelerating the breeding process and the development of improved crop varieties. The demand for advanced plant phenotyping technologies and tools is growing to support these research efforts.
Climate change poses significant challenges to global food security and agriculture. Researchers are actively investigating ways to enhance the resilience of crops to changing environmental conditions. Plant phenotyping is crucial in studying plant responses to climate change-related factors such as heat stress, water scarcity, elevated CO2 levels, and changing pest and disease dynamics. Researchers, by analyzing phenotypic data, can identify plant traits associated with resilience and develop strategies to breed climate-resilient crops. The research focus drives the demand for plant phenotyping solutions that can accurately capture and analyze plant responses to changing environmental conditions.
Phenotyping research allows scientists to study the complex interactions between plants and their environment. Researchers, by analyzing how plants respond to different environmental factors, gain insights into the underlying mechanisms that govern plant growth, development, and stress responses. The knowledge contributes to the development of sustainable agricultural practices, optimized resource allocation, and effective crop management strategies. The demand for advanced plant phenotyping technologies and methodologies increases, as researchers strive to deepen their understanding of plant-environment interactions.
Advancements in Imaging Technologies to Fuel the Market Growth
Advancements in imaging technologies have significantly contributed to the improvement of plant phenotyping by enhancing the accuracy, efficiency, and data quality of plant analysis and characterization. Hyperspectral imaging involves capturing images across a wide range of narrow contiguous spectral bands. Hyperspectral imaging, unlike traditional RGB imaging, provides a more detailed spectral profile of plants, enabling the identification and analysis of specific biochemical and physiological characteristics. It allows researchers to detect subtle variations in plant health, nutrient content, water stress, and disease symptoms. Researchers, by analyzing hyperspectral data, can gain insights into plant physiology and make informed decisions regarding crop management practices.
Traditional imaging techniques provide 2D representations of plants, which may limit the ability to accurately capture plant architecture and growth patterns. 3D imaging techniques, such as structured light scanning or laser scanning, enable the creation of high-resolution 3D models of plants, which allows for the precise measurement of plant height, volume, leaf area, branching patterns, and biomass distribution. Researchers can analyze these 3D models to understand plant growth dynamics, optimize plant breeding strategies, and assess the impact of environmental factors on plant development.
Drones equipped with imaging sensors have revolutionized plant phenotyping by providing a flexible and scalable solution for data collection over large agricultural areas. Drone-based imaging enables the monitoring of crops in real-time and at high spatial resolution, with the ability to capture images from various altitudes and angles. It allows for the rapid assessment of crop health, detection of stress factors, and identification of variability within fields. Drone-based imaging also facilitates the timely implementation of precision agriculture practices, such as targeted fertilization or irrigation, based on the obtained data.
Increasing Focus on Precision Agriculture to Accelerate the Market Growth
Precision agriculture involves the precise management of resources, such as water, fertilizers, pesticides, and seeds, to maximize crop productivity while minimizing input wastage and environmental impacts. Plant phenotyping plays a crucial role in enabling precision agriculture by providing essential data and insights for informed decision-making. Plant phenotyping allows for the continuous and non-destructive monitoring of crop health throughout the growing season. Phenotyping, by capturing data on plant morphology, physiology, and biochemical traits, provides insights into the overall health status of plants. The insights help identify early signs of stress, nutrient deficiencies, diseases, or pest infestations. Farmers, with this information, can take timely corrective measures, such as targeted application of fertilizers or pesticides, to prevent yield losses and maintain crop health.
Plant phenotyping enables the identification and characterization of stress factors affecting crops, such as drought, salinity, heat, or cold stress. Phenotyping, by monitoring plant responses to these stressors, provides valuable information on stress tolerance, adaptive mechanisms, and critical growth stages of crops. The monitoring helps farmers to implement site-specific management strategies and allocate resources effectively to mitigate the adverse effects of stress, ensuring optimal crop growth and productivity.
Precise resource allocation is a key objective of precision agriculture. Plant phenotyping data, combined with other geospatial and environmental data, can be used to create detailed maps of crop variability within fields. The maps help identify areas with varying nutrient requirements, water-holding capacity, or pest pressure. Farmers, by tailoring resource application based on these spatial variations, can optimize the use of fertilizers, water, and other inputs, reducing waste and minimizing environmental impact while maximizing crop yield.
Principal Consultant
High Initial Investment Cost to Restrain the Market Growth
The high initial investment costs associated with plant phenotyping technologies can present a significant barrier to the adoption and utilization of these advanced tools, especially for small-scale research institutions, agricultural organizations, and farmers with limited financial resources.
Implementing plant phenotyping technologies often requires the establishment of specialized infrastructure and facilities, which includes constructing or retrofitting greenhouse or growth chamber facilities with controlled environments, lighting systems, and temperature and humidity controls. Field-based phenotyping may require the setup of experimental plots or field stations equipped with sensor networks and data collection systems. The construction or modification of such infrastructure involves significant capital investment.
Plant phenotyping relies on a wide range of equipment and imaging systems to capture and analyze plant data, which includes high-resolution cameras, multispectral or hyperspectral imaging systems, lidar devices, spectrometers, and specialized sensors to measure plant characteristics such as biomass, leaf area, chlorophyll content, and water potential. These equipment and imaging systems can be expensive, especially when considering the need for high-quality and reliable instruments for accurate data acquisition.
Plant phenotyping often involves the use of various sensors to monitor environmental conditions and plant responses. The sensors can include temperature and humidity sensors, soil moisture sensors, nutrient sensors, gas analyzers, and weather stations. The cost of acquiring and maintaining these sensors can be significant, particularly when multiple sensors are required for comprehensive phenotyping studies.
Favorable Government Initiatives in North America to Fuel the Market Growth
The plant phenotyping market in North America is expected to accumulate a prominent CAGR of 10.9% in 2023.
The regional market growth is attributed to the factors such as the favorable government initiatives and funding. Governments in North America have been actively supporting agricultural research and development initiatives. They have been providing grants, funding programs, and incentives to promote innovation in agriculture and address food security challenges. Such support and funding for plant phenotyping research and technology development drive the growth of the sector by enabling the establishment of advanced phenotyping infrastructure and encouraging research collaboration. The market in the United States is anticipated to reach at US$ 87 million by 2033.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) offers various grant programs and funding opportunities to support agricultural research and innovation. For instance, the USDA's National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) provides grants through programs like the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI). The programs include funding streams for plant phenotyping research and technology development, enabling researchers to advance the field.
North America is home to renowned research institutions and academic centers that focus on plant sciences and agricultural research. The institutions have the expertise, facilities, and resources necessary for conducting cutting-edge plant phenotyping research. The presence of strong research and academic institutions contributes to the growth of plant phenotyping by fostering innovation, attracting talent, and facilitating collaborations with industry partners.
North America has a well-established technology and innovation ecosystem, with numerous companies and startups actively engaged in developing plant phenotyping technologies. Technological advancements, such as high-resolution imaging systems, sensor networks, and data analysis algorithms, enhance the efficiency and accuracy of plant phenotyping. Collaboration between industry players, research institutions, and agricultural organizations further drives innovation and accelerates the adoption of advanced plant phenotyping solutions.
Technological Advancements in the Region to Fuel the Market Growth
The plant phenotyping market in Asia Pacific is expected to accumulate a significant CAGR of 10.8% in 2023.
The Asia Pacific plant phenotyping market is expected to witness significant growth attributed to the increasing population and food demand. The region is experiencing rapid population growth and increasing food demand. To address food security challenges, there is a growing need for improved crop productivity, crop resilience, and sustainable agricultural practices. Plant phenotyping technologies play a crucial role in achieving these goals by providing insights into plant performance, stress tolerance, and crop improvement strategies.
The region is witnessing significant technological advancements in various fields, including imaging technology, sensor technology, and data analytics. The advancements contribute to the development of advanced plant phenotyping techniques and tools. Collaborations between research institutions, academia, and industry players foster innovation, accelerate technology transfer, and drive the growth of the plant phenotyping market in the region.
The Asia Pacific region is vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, including changing rainfall patterns, temperature extremes, and increased pest and disease pressures. There is a growing emphasis on developing climate-resilient crops and sustainable agricultural practices. Plant phenotyping plays a crucial role in understanding plant responses to climate stresses and identifying traits that can enhance crop resilience.
The adoption of precision agriculture techniques is increasing in the region as farmers seek to optimize resource utilization, minimize environmental impact, and increase farm efficiency. Plant phenotyping provides valuable data for precision agriculture applications, such as targeted nutrient management, irrigation optimization, and disease detection. The integration of plant phenotyping technologies in precision agriculture practices drives the demand for advanced phenotyping solutions.
Get the data you need at a Fraction of the cost
Personalize your report by choosing insights you need
and save 40%!
Imaging Systems Segment to beat Competition in Untiring Market
On the basis of equipment, the market is dominated by imaging systems segment, which is expected to hold a CAGR of 10.8% over the analysis period.
Continuous advancements in imaging technologies, such as hyperspectral imaging, multispectral imaging, thermal imaging, and fluorescence imaging, are driving the growth of this segment. The technologies allow for the capture of detailed information about various plant characteristics, including chlorophyll content, water stress, disease symptoms, and canopy structure. The development of high-resolution imaging systems with improved accuracy and speed enhances the capabilities of plant phenotyping and contributes to the segment's growth.
Imaging systems offer non-destructive data collection, allowing repeated measurements on the same plants over time without harming the samples. The non-destructive nature is particularly beneficial for longitudinal studies and enables researchers to track plant growth and development continuously. Imaging systems can capture data from multiple plants simultaneously, facilitating high-throughput phenotyping, which is crucial for large-scale experiments and breeding programs.
Imaging systems generate vast amounts of image data that require sophisticated analysis techniques. The integration of advanced analytics, such as image processing algorithms, computer vision, and machine learning, enhances the interpretation and extraction of meaningful insights from imaging data. The techniques enable the identification of specific plant traits, disease symptoms, stress factors, and growth patterns, driving the adoption of imaging systems for plant phenotyping applications.
Imaging systems are versatile and can be applied to various phenotyping approaches, including leaf-level phenotyping, canopy-level phenotyping, and root phenotyping. They provide a comprehensive view of plant performance and enable the assessment of multiple phenotypic traits simultaneously. The flexibility and scalability of imaging systems make them suitable for different research objectives and contribute to their increasing adoption in plant phenotyping.
Data Management & Integration Software Segment to Drive the Plant Phenotyping Market
Based on the software, the commercial segment is expected to expand at rapid rate of 10.7% CAGR over the analysis period.
The segmental growth can be attributed to the increasing number of efficient data organization and integration. Plant phenotyping involves the collection of diverse data types, including imaging data, sensor data, genomic data, environmental data, and metadata. Data management software provides tools and functionalities to organize and integrate these heterogeneous data types into a unified database. Efficient data organization and integration enable researchers to access and analyze comprehensive datasets, leading to a more holistic understanding of plant performance and traits.
Plant phenotyping experiments generate large volumes of data, requiring scalable and secure storage solutions. Data management software facilitates the storage and retrieval of phenotypic data, ensuring data integrity and accessibility. Scalable and secure data storage capabilities are crucial in managing and archiving phenotypic data for future reference, collaboration, and reproducibility of experiments.
Phenotypic data collected from different sources or experiments may have variations and inconsistencies. Data management software provides functionalities to perform quality control checks, data cleaning, and standardization procedures. The capabilities ensure the accuracy and reliability of phenotypic data, enabling researchers to make informed decisions based on high-quality data.
Data management software that can integrate with other phenotyping tools, imaging systems, or analytical platforms provides seamless workflows and data exchange capabilities. Integration with imaging analysis software, statistical analysis software, or genomic analysis tools allows for efficient data transfer and analysis, streamlining the phenotyping workflow and enhancing collaboration among researchers.
Plant phenotyping market startup players are adopting various marketing strategies such as new product launches, geographical expansion, merger and acquisitions, partnerships and collaboration to create a larger customer base. For instance,
Prominent players in the plant phenotyping market are LemnaTec GmbH, Qubit Systems Inc., Phenospex B.V., Keygene N.V., Rothamsted Research, CropDesign (a BASF company), Lemnatec Corp., Phenomix AG, PSI - Plant Phenotyping and Imaging Research Centre, and Heinz Walz GmbH, among others.
Recent Developments:
| Attribute | Details |
|---|---|
| Growth Rate | CAGR of 11.0% from 2023 to 2033 |
| Market Value in 2023 | US$ 175.9 million |
| Market Value in 2033 | US$ 497.4 million |
| Base Year for Estimation | 2022 |
| Historical Data | 2018 to 2022 |
| Forecast Period | 2023 to 2033 |
| Quantitative Units | Revenue in US$ million and CAGR from 2023 to 2033 |
| Report Coverage | Revenue Forecast, Company Ranking, Competitive Landscape, Growth Factors, Trends and Pricing Analysis |
| Segments Covered |
|
| Regions Covered |
|
| Key Countries Profiled |
|
| Key Companies Profiled |
|
The global demand for plant phenotyping services is forecasted to rise at 11% CAGR through 2033.
The global plant phenotyping market could reach a value of US$ 497.4 million by 2033.
The United States is expected to lead the overall market by acquiring US$ 87 million by 2033.
Asia Pacific market could grow at 10.8% CAGR through 2033 due to rising industrialization.
The commercial software segment is poised to witness an increment at 10.7% per year until 2033.
1. Executive Summary 1.1. Global Market Outlook 1.2. Demand-side Trends 1.3. Supply-side Trends 1.4. Technology Roadmap Analysis 1.5. Analysis and Recommendations 2. Market Overview 2.1. Market Coverage / Taxonomy 2.2. Market Definition / Scope / Limitations 3. Market Background 3.1. Market Dynamics 3.1.1. Drivers 3.1.2. Restraints 3.1.3. Opportunity 3.1.4. Trends 3.2. Scenario Forecast 3.2.1. Demand in Optimistic Scenario 3.2.2. Demand in Likely Scenario 3.2.3. Demand in Conservative Scenario 3.3. Opportunity Map Analysis 3.4. Investment Feasibility Matrix 3.5. PESTLE and Porter’s Analysis 3.6. Regulatory Landscape 3.6.1. By Key Regions 3.6.2. By Key Countries 3.7. Regional Parent Market Outlook 4. Global Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast, 2023 to 2033 4.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Analysis, 2018 to 2022 4.2. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ Million) Projections, 2023 to 2033 4.2.1. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis 4.2.2. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis 5. Global Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Equipment 5.1. Introduction / Key Findings 5.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Analysis By Equipment, 2018 to 2022 5.3. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ Million) Analysis and Forecast By Equipment, 2023 to 2033 5.3.1. Growth Chambers/Phytotrons 5.3.2. Imaging Systems 5.3.3. Robotics and Automation 5.3.4. Phenomobiles 5.4. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By Equipment, 2018 to 2022 5.5. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By Equipment, 2023 to 2033 6. Global Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Software 6.1. Introduction / Key Findings 6.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Analysis By Software, 2018 to 2022 6.3. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ Million) Analysis and Forecast By Software, 2023 to 2033 6.3.1. Image Analysis Software 6.3.2. Data Management and Integration Software 6.3.3. Statistical Analysis and Modeling Software 6.4. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By Software, 2018 to 2022 6.5. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By Software, 2023 to 2033 7. Global Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Sensors 7.1. Introduction / Key Findings 7.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Analysis by Sensors, 2018 to 2022 7.3. Current and Future Market Size Value (US$ Million) Analysis and Forecast by Sensors, 2023 to 2033 7.3.1. Environmental Sensors 7.3.2. Physiological Sensors 7.3.3. Spectral Sensors 7.4. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis by Sensors, 2018 to 2022 7.5. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis by Sensors, 2023 to 2033 8. Global Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Region 8.1. Introduction 8.2. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Analysis By Region, 2018 to 2022 8.3. Current Market Size Value (US$ Million) Analysis and Forecast By Region, 2023 to 2033 8.3.1. North America 8.3.2. Latin America 8.3.3. Europe 8.3.4. South Asia 8.3.5. East Asia 8.3.6. Oceania 8.3.7. MEA 8.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Region 9. North America Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country 9.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022 9.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033 9.2.1. By Country 9.2.1.1. The USA 9.2.1.2. Canada 9.2.2. By Equipment 9.2.3. By Software 9.2.4. By Sensors 9.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis 9.3.1. By Country 9.3.2. By Equipment 9.3.3. By Software 9.3.4. By Sensors 9.4. Key Takeaways 10. Latin America Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country 10.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022 10.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033 10.2.1. By Country 10.2.1.1. Brazil 10.2.1.2. Mexico 10.2.1.3. Rest of Latin America 10.2.2. By Equipment 10.2.3. By Software 10.2.4. By Sensors 10.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis 10.3.1. By Country 10.3.2. By Equipment 10.3.3. By Software 10.3.4. By Sensors 10.4. Key Takeaways 11. Europe Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country 11.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022 11.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033 11.2.1. By Country 11.2.1.1. Germany 11.2.1.2. United Kingdom 11.2.1.3. France 11.2.1.4. Spain 11.2.1.5. Italy 11.2.1.6. Rest of Europe 11.2.2. By Equipment 11.2.3. By Software 11.2.4. By Sensors 11.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis 11.3.1. By Country 11.3.2. By Equipment 11.3.3. By Software 11.3.4. By Sensors 11.4. Key Takeaways 12. South Asia Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country 12.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022 12.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033 12.2.1. By Country 12.2.1.1. India 12.2.1.2. Malaysia 12.2.1.3. Singapore 12.2.1.4. Thailand 12.2.1.5. Rest of South Asia 12.2.2. By Equipment 12.2.3. By Software 12.2.4. By Sensors 12.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis 12.3.1. By Country 12.3.2. By Equipment 12.3.3. By Software 12.3.4. By Sensors 12.4. Key Takeaways 13. East Asia Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country 13.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022 13.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033 13.2.1. By Country 13.2.1.1. China 13.2.1.2. Japan 13.2.1.3. South Korea 13.2.2. By Equipment 13.2.3. By Software 13.2.4. By Sensors 13.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis 13.3.1. By Country 13.3.2. By Equipment 13.3.3. By Software 13.3.4. By Sensors 13.4. Key Takeaways 14. Oceania Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country 14.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022 14.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033 14.2.1. By Country 14.2.1.1. Australia 14.2.1.2. New Zealand 14.2.2. By Equipment 14.2.3. By Software 14.2.4. By Sensors 14.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis 14.3.1. By Country 14.3.2. By Equipment 14.3.3. By Software 14.3.4. By Sensors 14.4. Key Takeaways 15. MEA Market Analysis 2018 to 2022 and Forecast 2023 to 2033, By Country 15.1. Historical Market Size Value (US$ Million) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 to 2022 15.2. Market Size Value (US$ Million) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 to 2033 15.2.1. By Country 15.2.1.1. GCC Countries 15.2.1.2. South Africa 15.2.1.3. Israel 15.2.1.4. Rest of MEA 15.2.2. By Equipment 15.2.3. By Software 15.2.4. By Sensors 15.3. Market Attractiveness Analysis 15.3.1. By Country 15.3.2. By Equipment 15.3.3. By Software 15.3.4. By Sensors 15.4. Key Takeaways 16. Key Countries Market Analysis 16.1. USA 16.1.1. Pricing Analysis 16.1.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.1.2.1. By Equipment 16.1.2.2. By Software 16.1.2.3. By Sensors 16.2. Canada 16.2.1. Pricing Analysis 16.2.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.2.2.1. By Equipment 16.2.2.2. By Software 16.2.2.3. By Sensors 16.3. Brazil 16.3.1. Pricing Analysis 16.3.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.3.2.1. By Equipment 16.3.2.2. By Software 16.3.2.3. By Sensors 16.4. Mexico 16.4.1. Pricing Analysis 16.4.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.4.2.1. By Equipment 16.4.2.2. By Software 16.4.2.3. By Sensors 16.5. Germany 16.5.1. Pricing Analysis 16.5.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.5.2.1. By Equipment 16.5.2.2. By Software 16.5.2.3. By Sensors 16.6. United Kingdom 16.6.1. Pricing Analysis 16.6.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.6.2.1. By Equipment 16.6.2.2. By Software 16.6.2.3. By Sensors 16.7. France 16.7.1. Pricing Analysis 16.7.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.7.2.1. By Equipment 16.7.2.2. By Software 16.7.2.3. By Sensors 16.8. Spain 16.8.1. Pricing Analysis 16.8.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.8.2.1. By Equipment 16.8.2.2. By Software 16.8.2.3. By Sensors 16.9. Italy 16.9.1. Pricing Analysis 16.9.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.9.2.1. By Equipment 16.9.2.2. By Software 16.9.2.3. By Sensors 16.10. India 16.10.1. Pricing Analysis 16.10.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.10.2.1. By Equipment 16.10.2.2. By Software 16.10.2.3. By Sensors 16.11. Malaysia 16.11.1. Pricing Analysis 16.11.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.11.2.1. By Equipment 16.11.2.2. By Software 16.11.2.3. By Sensors 16.12. Singapore 16.12.1. Pricing Analysis 16.12.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.12.2.1. By Equipment 16.12.2.2. By Software 16.12.2.3. By Sensors 16.13. Thailand 16.13.1. Pricing Analysis 16.13.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.13.2.1. By Equipment 16.13.2.2. By Software 16.13.2.3. By Sensors 16.14. China 16.14.1. Pricing Analysis 16.14.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.14.2.1. By Equipment 16.14.2.2. By Software 16.14.2.3. By Sensors 16.15. Japan 16.15.1. Pricing Analysis 16.15.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.15.2.1. By Equipment 16.15.2.2. By Software 16.15.2.3. By Sensors 16.16. South Korea 16.16.1. Pricing Analysis 16.16.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.16.2.1. By Equipment 16.16.2.2. By Software 16.16.2.3. By Sensors 16.17. Australia 16.17.1. Pricing Analysis 16.17.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.17.2.1. By Equipment 16.17.2.2. By Software 16.17.2.3. By Sensors 16.18. New Zealand 16.18.1. Pricing Analysis 16.18.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.18.2.1. By Equipment 16.18.2.2. By Software 16.18.2.3. By Sensors 16.19. GCC Countries 16.19.1. Pricing Analysis 16.19.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.19.2.1. By Equipment 16.19.2.2. By Software 16.19.2.3. By Sensors 16.20. South Africa 16.20.1. Pricing Analysis 16.20.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.20.2.1. By Equipment 16.20.2.2. By Software 16.20.2.3. By Sensors 16.21. Israel 16.21.1. Pricing Analysis 16.21.2. Market Share Analysis, 2022 16.21.2.1. By Equipment 16.21.2.2. By Software 16.21.2.3. By Sensors 17. Market Structure Analysis 17.1. Competition Dashboard 17.2. Competition Benchmarking 17.3. Market Share Analysis of Top Players 17.3.1. By Regional 17.3.2. By Equipment 17.3.3. By Software 17.3.4. By Sensors 18. Competition Analysis 18.1. Competition Deep Dive 18.1.1. LemnaTec GmbH 18.1.1.1. Overview 18.1.1.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.1.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.1.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.1.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.1.5.1. Marketing Strategy 18.1.2. Qubit Systems Inc. 18.1.2.1. Overview 18.1.2.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.2.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.2.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.2.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.2.5.1. Marketing Strategy 18.1.3. Phenospex B.V. 18.1.3.1. Overview 18.1.3.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.3.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.3.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.3.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.3.5.1. Marketing Strategy 18.1.4. Keygene N.V. 18.1.4.1. Overview 18.1.4.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.4.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.4.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.4.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.4.5.1. Marketing Strategy 18.1.5. Rothamsted Research 18.1.5.1. Overview 18.1.5.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.5.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.5.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.5.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.5.5.1. Marketing Strategy 18.1.6. CropDesign (a BASF company) 18.1.6.1. Overview 18.1.6.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.6.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.6.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.6.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.6.5.1. Marketing Strategy 18.1.7. Lemnatec Corp. 18.1.7.1. Overview 18.1.7.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.7.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.7.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.7.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.7.5.1. Marketing Strategy 18.1.8. Phenomix AG 18.1.8.1. Overview 18.1.8.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.8.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.8.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.8.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.8.5.1. Marketing Strategy 18.1.9. PSI - and Imaging Research Centre 18.1.9.1. Overview 18.1.9.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.9.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.9.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.9.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.9.5.1. Marketing Strategy 18.1.10. Heinz Walz GmbH 18.1.10.1. Overview 18.1.10.2. Product Portfolio 18.1.10.3. Profitability by Market Segments 18.1.10.4. Sales Footprint 18.1.10.5. Strategy Overview 18.1.10.5.1. Marketing Strategy 19. Assumptions & Acronyms Used 20. Research Methodology
Industrial Automation
June 2023
REP-GB-17426
300 pages
Explore Industrial Automation Insights
View Reports
Plant Phenotyping Market
