Products from Food Waste Industry Analysis in Korea Size, Share and Forecast Outlook 2025 to 2035

Sales of products from food waste in Korea are estimated at USD 2.1 billion in 2025 and are projected to reach USD 2.9 billion by 2035, reflecting a CAGR of approximately 3.5% over the forecast period.

Products From Food Waste Industry Analysis In Korea

Quick Stats for Products From Food Waste In Korea

  • Food Waste Sales Value (2025): USD 2.1 billion
  • Food Waste Forecast Value (2035): USD 2.9 billion
  • Food Waste Forecast CAGR (2025-2035): 3.5%
  • Leading Segment in Food Waste (2025): Food Processing (19% share)
  • Key Growth Regions in Food Waste in Korea: South Gyeongsang, North Jeolla, Jeju
  • Key Players in Food Waste in Korea: CJ Group, Samsung C\&T, Hyundai Green Food, Lotte Group, SK Group, Hanwha Group, LG Group, Doosan Corporation, POSCO, KIFST, KEITI, KAIST

Products From Food Waste Industry Analysis In Korea 2

Metric Value
Estimated Size (2025E) USD 2.1 billion
Projected Value (2035F) USD 2.9 billion
CAGR (2025 to 2035) 3.5%

This growth reflects expanding government support for environmental practices, increasing consumer awareness of ecological responsibility, and growing corporate investment in waste reduction technologies. The rise in demand is linked to regulatory initiatives like the food waste recycling law, technological progress in biorefining and fermentation, and evolving consumer preferences for upcycled food products. Regional development shows concentrated activity in South Gyeongsang, leveraging agricultural resources, North Jeolla focusing on farmer collaboration programs, and Jeju developing tourism-oriented environmental initiatives.

The largest contribution to demand continues to come from food processing applications, which are expected to account for 19% of total sales in 2025, owing to regulatory compliance requirements, cost-effective alternative materials, and enhanced product differentiation capabilities. By source material, citrus fruits represent a significant segment with an 8% share, driven by abundant byproduct availability from citrus processing operations and valuable compound extraction for cosmetics and functional foods.

Consumer adoption is particularly concentrated among environmentally conscious businesses seeking responsible alternatives and consumers demanding eco-friendly products. While processing costs remain considerations, continued research and development investments are improving efficiency and expanding product applications. Regional collaboration patterns are emerging, with South Gyeongsang excelling in agricultural waste utilization, North Jeolla leading in farmer partnership models, and Jeju developing tourism-integrated environmental programs that showcase ecological responsibility.

Segmental Analysis

The food waste segment in Korea is classified into several categories. By source, the key materials include mango, apples, grapes, citrus fruits, carrots, beetroot, and other fruits and vegetables including berries. By end user, the segment spans food processing, beverage processing, cosmetics and personal care, animal feed, and other uses including dietary supplements and nutraceuticals. By region, coverage includes South Gyeongsang, North Jeolla, South Jeolla, Jeju, and the rest of Korea.

By Source, Citrus Fruits to Lead Value Creation with 8% Share

Products From Food Waste Industry Analysis In Korea By Source

Citrus fruits are projected to drive significant value creation in 2025, supported by abundant byproduct availability from juice processing operations and established extraction technologies for valuable compounds. Other sources, such as mango, apples, and vegetables, are developing steadily, each serving distinct processing applications.

  • Citrus fruits are expected to hold an 8% value share in 2025, driven by nutrient-rich peels and pulps containing antioxidants, vitamins, and dietary fiber, established extraction processes for essential oils and compounds, and growing demand for natural ingredients in cosmetics and functional food applications using responsible sourcing methods.
  • Mango waste is gaining momentum in functional food applications, especially for dietary fiber extraction and antioxidant compound recovery, supported by seasonal abundance and increasing research into value-added processing techniques for health-conscious consumer segments.
  • Apple pomace shows strong development in animal feed formulations and pectin extraction, with steady growth tied to consistent supply from apple processing facilities and demand for natural additives in food manufacturing and nutritional supplement production.
  • Vegetable sources including carrots and beetroot appeal to organic fertilizer producers and are expanding through agricultural applications and natural pigment extraction; while still developing, they offer alternatives to synthetic agricultural inputs.

By End User, Food Processing to Lead with 19% Share

Products From Food Waste Industry Analysis In Korea By End User

Products from food waste in Korea are utilized across diverse end user applications spanning multiple sectors. Food processing is expected to remain the primary end user in 2025, followed by animal feed and cosmetics applications. Utilization strategies are evolving to match regulatory requirements, with growth coming from both traditional and innovative applications.

  • Food processing is projected to account for 19% of total end user applications in 2025, supported by regulatory compliance requirements for waste reduction, cost-effective alternatives to traditional raw materials, and enhanced product differentiation capabilities through innovative ingredients and additives from food waste sources.
  • Animal feed applications are expanding their role through nutritious and cost-effective feed alternatives from food waste materials, targeting livestock and pet nutrition with growing interest in sustainable feed sources that reduce environmental impact while maintaining nutritional quality.
  • Beverage processing applications are forecast to grow significantly, fueled by natural ingredient extraction for flavor enhancement, functional compounds for health beverages, and innovative fermentation processes using food waste substrates in specialty beverage production.
  • Cosmetics and personal care applications are increasingly utilizing citrus extracts and oils from food waste for fragrance and skin benefits, appealing to consumers seeking natural ingredients and environmentally responsible beauty products with transparent sourcing.
  • Other applications including dietary supplements and nutraceuticals maintain specialized demand focused on bioactive compound extraction, functional ingredient development, and premium health products contributing to consistent revenue growth in health-conscious consumer segments.

Sales of Products from Food Waste in Korea by Region

Products From Food Waste Industry Analysis In Korea By Country

Regions CAGR (2025 to 2035)
South Gyeongsang 6.3%
North Jeolla 5.8%
South Jeolla 5.7%
Jeju 5.2%

Products from food waste development will not progress uniformly across every region. Strong agricultural infrastructure and established waste processing networks in South Gyeongsang provide measurable advantages, while emerging regions develop capabilities from specialized applications and collaborative partnerships. The regional analysis shows distinct development patterns each area is expected to follow based on resource availability, infrastructure development, and economic priorities.

Between 2025 and 2035, South Gyeongsang is projected to record the highest CAGR at 6.3%, outpacing all other Korean regions in products from food waste utilization. This leadership is fueled by the region’s strong agricultural and fisheries base, enabling large-scale byproduct conversion from farming and seafood operations. Government-backed recycling initiatives and investment in processing infrastructure further strengthen its position.

North Jeolla, growing at 5.8%, follows closely, benefiting from structured collaboration between waste processors and farmers. Its emphasis on waste-to-energy projects and public awareness campaigns supports faster adoption, narrowing the growth gap with South Gyeongsang and positioning it as a strong regional contender.

South Jeolla is expected to grow at 5.7%, just behind North Jeolla, with strengths in integrated agricultural processing and responsible farming systems. Its role in supporting traditional farming communities aligns with broader circular economy goals. Jeju, at 5.2%, demonstrates slower growth but stands out for tourism-linked environmental projects, turning waste processing into a showcase for ecological responsibility.

While growth is more modest, its emphasis on hospitality partnerships and eco-entrepreneurship provides niche advantages. The rest of Korea, though not quantified here, is gaining traction through distributed processing networks and localized waste management initiatives, contributing to a balanced national growth outlook.

Products from Food Waste Regional Analysis: Key Specializations

The products from food waste category serves diverse regional applications across resource utilization, economic development models, and environmental objectives. While motivations vary from waste reduction to economic opportunity to stewardship, development is concentrated across five key regional specializations. Each region brings distinct resource advantages, infrastructure capabilities, and collaboration approaches.

  • South Gyeongsang represents the agricultural hub prioritizing resource utilization and value creation; this region excels in agricultural waste processing from farming operations, seafood processing waste conversion, and local government partnership programs supporting comprehensive waste reduction initiatives.
  • North Jeolla shows high specialization in farmer collaboration models aligned with responsible agricultural practices; this region actively develops partnership programs between processors and farmers, waste-to-energy projects for rural communities, and public awareness campaigns promoting environmental consciousness and product adoption.
  • South Jeolla focuses on integrated agricultural processing and regional economic development, motivated by comprehensive waste management and community enhancement; their programs include regional processing facility networks, agricultural productivity improvement initiatives, and community-based economic development supporting traditional farming areas.
  • Jeju emphasizes tourism-integrated environmental programs and entrepreneurial development, favoring demonstration projects and visitor education initiatives; their approach includes environmental tourism showcases, startup ecosystem development for environmental solutions, and hospitality business collaboration creating visible ecological initiatives.
  • Rest of Korea regions, including smaller communities managing resource constraints and infrastructure limitations, actively develop distributed processing networks and localized solutions, demonstrating commitment to community-based waste management when technical support and economic incentives are accessible.

Notable Players and Strategies in Korea Products from Food Waste Space

Products From Food Waste Industry Analysis In Korea By Company

The competitive environment is characterized by a mix of established conglomerates, technology developers, and emerging environmentally focused enterprises. Processing scale and technology capabilities rather than product diversity remain the decisive success factors: the leading companies collectively process significant volumes of food waste annually and maintain comprehensive coverage across multiple application areas.

CJ Group represents a mature participant in food processing and waste management. The company operates comprehensive food processing operations, waste recycling facility development, and technology integration programs. Its approach includes large-scale processing infrastructure development, responsible supply chain integration, and research collaboration supporting circular economy principles while maintaining national coverage through established food operations and distribution networks.

Samsung C&T operates as a technology and infrastructure developer leveraging advanced engineering capabilities and research partnerships. The company focuses on innovative product development from food waste, partnership programs with research institutions, and technology commercialization supporting waste-to-product conversion. Operational capabilities include engineering expertise, technology development resources, and comprehensive project management supporting large-scale facility development.

Hyundai Green Food provides specialized processing solutions and product development services supporting diverse food waste applications. The company leverages food processing expertise and technology integration capabilities to develop comprehensive product lines including compost, fertilizer, and animal feed using advanced processing technologies. Recent initiatives focus on technology diversification and processing efficiency improvement.

Lotte Group develops integrated solutions combining retail operations, processing capabilities, and investment programs supporting food waste utilization. The company provides comprehensive investment programs for processing facility development, technology advancement supporting conversion efficiency, and retail integration enabling product distribution across established consumer networks.

SK Group specializes in technology development and energy applications supporting waste-to-energy conversion and advanced processing technologies. The company provides comprehensive technology solutions, energy system integration, and operational efficiency programs that ensure reliable processing and energy recovery from food waste streams.

Other significant players include Hanwha Group, LG Group, and Doosan Corporation, each focusing on specialized applications including engineering solutions, equipment manufacturing, and system integration. These companies contribute essential capabilities in technology development, operational services, and infrastructure development that support sector advancement across multiple applications and regions.

Academic partnerships through KIFST, KEITI, and KAIST provide ongoing innovation in processing technologies, product development, and efficiency optimization. Government initiatives through regulatory support and development programs expand processing capacity and application development, putting advancement pressure on traditional waste management approaches while supporting comprehensive circular economy implementation.

Scope of Report in Korea’s Food Waste Space

Item Value
Quantitative Units (2025) 2.1 billion
Source Mangoes, Apples, Grapes, Citrus Fruits, Carrots, Beetroot, Berries, Others
End User Food Processing, Beverage Processing, Cosmetics & Personal Care, Dietary Supplements & Nutraceuticals, Animal Feed, Others
Regions Covered South Gyeongsang, North Jeolla, South Jeolla, Jeju, Rest of Korea
Key Companies Profiled ReHarvest, Ecoand, CJ CheilJedang Corp., Jrink Juicery, Misfit Foods, ReGrained LLC, Rise Products, Rubies in the Rubble, Snact Ltd., Toast Ale Ltd., Aeropowder, Bio-bean Ltd., and Circular Systems S.P.C.
Additional Attributes Dollar sales by application and purity grade, regional demand trends, competitive landscape, consumer preferences for natural versus synthetic alternatives, integration with sustainable sourcing practices, innovations in extraction technology and quality standardization for diverse industrial applications

Key Segments

By Source:

  • Mangoes
  • Apples
  • Grapes
  • Citrus Fruits
  • Carrots
  • Beetroot
  • Berries
  • Others

By End User:

  • Food Processing
  • Beverage Processing
  • Cosmetics & Personal Care
  • Dietary Supplements & Nutraceuticals
  • Animal Feed
  • Others

By Province:

  • South Gyeongsang
  • North Jeolla
  • South Jeolla
  • Jeju

Table of Content

  1. Executive Summary
    • Korea Market Outlook
    • Demand-side Trends
    • Supply-side Trends
    • Technology Roadmap Analysis
    • Analysis and Recommendations
  2. Market Overview
    • Market Coverage / Taxonomy
    • Market Definition / Scope / Limitations
  3. Market Background
    • Market Dynamics
      • Drivers
      • Restraints
      • Opportunity
      • Trends
    • Scenario Forecast
      • Demand in Optimistic Scenario
      • Demand in Likely Scenario
      • Demand in Conservative Scenario
    • Opportunity Map Analysis
    • Product Life Cycle Analysis
    • Supply Chain Analysis
      • Supply Side Participants and their Roles
        • Producers
        • Mid-Level Participants (Traders/ Agents/ Brokers)
        • Wholesalers and Distributors
      • Value Added and Value Created at Node in the Supply Chain
      • List of Raw Material Suppliers
      • List of Existing and Potential Buyer’s
    • Investment Feasibility Matrix
    • Value Chain Analysis
      • Profit Margin Analysis
      • Wholesalers and Distributors
      • Retailers
    • PESTLE and Porter’s Analysis
    • Regulatory Landscape
      • By Key Regions
      • By Key Countries
    • Regional Parent Market Outlook
    • Production and Consumption Statistics
    • Import and Export Statistics
  4. Market Analysis 2020 to 2024 and Forecast, 2025 to 2035
    • Historical Market Size Value (USD Billion) & Volume (Metric Tons) Analysis, 2020 to 2024
    • Current and Future Market Size Value (USD Billion) & Volume (Metric Tons) Projections, 2025 to 2035
      • Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis
      • Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis
  5. Market Pricing Analysis 2020 to 2024 and Forecast 2025 to 2035
  6. Market Analysis 2020 to 2024 and Forecast 2025 to 2035, By Source
    • Introduction / Key Findings
    • Historical Market Size Value (USD Billion) & Volume (Metric Tons) Analysis By Source, 2020 to 2024
    • Current and Future Market Size Value (USD Billion) & Volume (Metric Tons) Analysis and Forecast By Source, 2025 to 2035
      • Mango
      • Apples
      • Grapes
      • Citrus Fruits
      • Carrots
      • Beetroot
      • Berries
      • Others
    • Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By Source, 2020 to 2024
    • Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By Source, 2025 to 2035
  7. Market Analysis 2020 to 2024 and Forecast 2025 to 2035, By End User
    • Introduction / Key Findings
    • Historical Market Size Value (USD Billion) & Volume (Metric Tons) Analysis By End User, 2020 to 2024
    • Current and Future Market Size Value (USD Billion) & Volume (Metric Tons) Analysis and Forecast By End User, 2025 to 2035
      • Food Processing
      • Beverage Processing
      • Cosmetics & Personal Care
      • Dietary Supplements & Nutraceuticals
      • Animal feed
      • Others
    • Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis By End User, 2020 to 2024
    • Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis By End User, 2025 to 2035
  8. Key Countries Food Waste Conversion Market Analysis
    • South Geongsang
      • Pricing Analysis
      • Market Share Analysis, 2024
        • By Source
        • By End User
    • North Jeolla
      • Pricing Analysis
      • Market Share Analysis, 2024
        • By Source
        • By End User
    • South Jeolla
      • Pricing Analysis
      • Market Share Analysis, 2024
        • By Source
        • By End User
    • Jeju
      • Pricing Analysis
      • Market Share Analysis, 2024
        • By Source
        • By End User
  9. Market Structure Analysis
    • Competition Dashboard
    • Competition Benchmarking
    • Market Share Analysis of Top Players
      • By Regional
      • By Source
      • By End User
  10. Competition Analysis
    • Competition Deep Dive
      • ReHarvest
        • Overview
        • Product Portfolio
        • Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Age /Sales Channel/Region)
        • Sales Footprint
        • Strategy Overview
          • Marketing Strategy
          • Product Strategy
          • Channel Strategy
      • Ecoand
        • Overview
        • Product Portfolio
        • Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Age /Sales Channel/Region)
        • Sales Footprint
        • Strategy Overview
          • Marketing Strategy
          • Product Strategy
          • Channel Strategy
      • CJ CheilJedang
        • Overview
        • Product Portfolio
        • Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Age /Sales Channel/Region)
        • Sales Footprint
        • Strategy Overview
          • Marketing Strategy
          • Product Strategy
          • Channel Strategy
      • Jrink Juicery
        • Overview
        • Product Portfolio
        • Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Age /Sales Channel/Region)
        • Sales Footprint
        • Strategy Overview
          • Marketing Strategy
          • Product Strategy
          • Channel Strategy
      • Misfit Food
        • Overview
        • Product Portfolio
        • Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Age /Sales Channel/Region)
        • Sales Footprint
        • Strategy Overview
          • Marketing Strategy
          • Product Strategy
          • Channel Strategy
      • ReGrained, LLC
        • Overview
        • Product Portfolio
        • Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Age /Sales Channel/Region)
        • Sales Footprint
        • Strategy Overview
          • Marketing Strategy
          • Product Strategy
          • Channel Strategy
      • Rise Products
        • Overview
        • Product Portfolio
        • Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Age /Sales Channel/Region)
        • Sales Footprint
        • Strategy Overview
          • Marketing Strategy
          • Product Strategy
          • Channel Strategy
      • Rubies in the Rubble
        • Overview
        • Product Portfolio
        • Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Age /Sales Channel/Region)
        • Sales Footprint
        • Strategy Overview
          • Marketing Strategy
          • Product Strategy
          • Channel Strategy
      • Snact Ltd.
        • Overview
        • Product Portfolio
        • Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Age /Sales Channel/Region)
        • Sales Footprint
        • Strategy Overview
          • Marketing Strategy
          • Product Strategy
          • Channel Strategy
      • Toast Ale Ltd.
        • Overview
        • Product Portfolio
        • Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Age /Sales Channel/Region)
        • Sales Footprint
        • Strategy Overview
          • Marketing Strategy
          • Product Strategy
          • Channel Strategy
      • Aeropower
        • Overview
        • Product Portfolio
        • Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Age /Sales Channel/Region)
        • Sales Footprint
        • Strategy Overview
          • Marketing Strategy
          • Product Strategy
          • Channel Strategy
      • Bio-bean Ltd.
        • Overview
        • Product Portfolio
        • Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Age /Sales Channel/Region)
        • Sales Footprint
        • Strategy Overview
          • Marketing Strategy
          • Product Strategy
          • Channel Strategy
      • Circular Systems S.P.C.
        • Overview
        • Product Portfolio
        • Profitability by Market Segments (Product/Age /Sales Channel/Region)
        • Sales Footprint
        • Strategy Overview
          • Marketing Strategy
          • Product Strategy
          • Channel Strategy
  11. Assumptions & Acronyms Used
  12. Research Methodology

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the projected sales value of products from food waste in Korea by 2025?

In 2025, the total sales of products from food waste in Korea will be valued at USD 2.1 billion.

What is the outlook for products from food waste sales in Korea by 2035?

By 2035, the sales of products from food waste in Korea are forecasted to reach USD 2.9 billion, reflecting a CAGR of 3.5%.

Which end-use segment dominates the products from food waste category in Korea in 2025?

Food processing leads the end-use segment with a 19% share in 2025, followed by animal feed and cosmetics applications.

Which regions are projected to have the fastest growth for products from food waste in Korea?

South Gyeongsang and North Jeolla are expected to lead growth, with South Gyeongsang focusing on agricultural and fisheries waste, and North Jeolla on farmer collaboration programs.

Which source material will be most significant for products from food waste in Korea in 2025?

Citrus fruits dominate the source material category with an 8% share in 2025.

Explore Similar Insights

Future Market Insights

Products from Food Waste Industry Analysis in Korea

Chat With

MaRIA

Hi There, I am MaRIA, Your Market Research Intelligence Assistant. How may I help you?